<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD with OASIS Tables with MathML3 v1.1 20151215//EN"
                         "JATS-journalpublishing-oasis-article1-mathml3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.1" xml:lang="en"
	xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"
	xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
	<front>
		<journal-meta>
			<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">COLLBOT</journal-id>
			<journal-title-group>
				<journal-title>Collectanea Botanica</journal-title>
				<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">Collect. Bot.</abbrev-journal-title>
			</journal-title-group>
			<issn publication-format="print">0010-0730</issn>
			<issn publication-format="electronic">1989-1067</issn>
			<issn-l>0010-0730</issn-l>
			<publisher>
				<publisher-name>Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas</publisher-name>
			</publisher>
		</journal-meta>
		<article-meta>
			<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">collectbot.2022.v41.002</article-id>
			<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3989/collectbot.2022.v41.002</article-id>
			<article-categories>
				<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
					<subject>Artículo</subject>
				</subj-group>
			</article-categories>
			<title-group>
				<article-title>Microsatellite data reveal genetic restructuring of <italic>Medicago sinskiae</italic> (Fabaceae) in western and southwestern Iran</article-title>
				<trans-title-group xml:lang="es">
					<trans-title>Los marcadores microsatélite revelan la reestructuración genética de <italic>Medicago sinskiae</italic> (<italic>Fabaceae</italic>) en el oeste y el sudoeste de Irán</trans-title>
				</trans-title-group>
				<alt-title alt-title-type="running-head">Microsatellite data reveal genetic restructuring of 'Medicago sinskiae' (Fabaceae) in western and southwestern Iran</alt-title>
			</title-group>
			<contrib-group>
				<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6496-6216</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Zareei</surname>
						<given-names>Raha</given-names>
					</name>
					<aff id="aff1">
						<institution>Department of Biology, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University</institution>, <addr-line>IR-1477893855 Tehran</addr-line>, <country>Iran</country>
					</aff>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0654-6966</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Small</surname>
						<given-names>Ernest</given-names>
					</name>
					<aff id="aff2">
						<institution>Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa Research and Development Centre</institution>, <addr-line>K.W. Neatby Building, 960 Carling Ave., CA-K1A 0C6 Ottawa</addr-line>, <country>Canada</country>
					</aff>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9014-585X</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Assadi</surname>
						<given-names>Mostafa</given-names>
					</name>
					<aff id="aff3">
						<institution>Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands, Agricultural Research Education and Extension Organization (AREEO)</institution>, <addr-line>IR-13185116 Tehran</addr-line>, <country>Iran</country>
					</aff>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5108-2558</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Mehregan</surname>
						<given-names>Iraj</given-names>
					</name>
					<email xlink:href="iraj@daad-alumni.de">iraj@daad-alumni.de</email>
					<email xlink:href="imehregan@srbiau.ac.ir">imehregan@srbiau.ac.ir</email>
					<aff id="aff4">
						<institution>Department of Biology, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University</institution>, <addr-line>IR-1477893855 Tehran</addr-line>, <country>Iran</country>
					</aff>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="editor">
					<name>
						<surname>López-Alvarado</surname>
						<given-names>J.</given-names>
					</name>
				</contrib>
			</contrib-group>
			<pub-date pub-type="epub">
				<day>30</day>
				<month>12</month>
				<year>2022</year>
			</pub-date>
			<pub-date pub-type="collection">
				<year>2022</year>
			</pub-date>
			<volume>41</volume>
			<issue>1</issue>
			<elocation-id>e002</elocation-id>
			<history>
				<date date-type="received">
					<day>26</day>
					<month>06</month>
					<year>2021</year>
				</date>
				<date date-type="accepted">
					<day>02</day>
					<month>11</month>
					<year>2021</year>
				</date>
				<date date-type="available-online">
					<day>07</day>
					<month>04</month>
					<year>2022</year>
				</date>
			</history>
			<permissions>
				<copyright-statement>©2022 CSIC</copyright-statement>
				<copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
				<license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
					<license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License.</license-p>
				</license>
			</permissions>
			<self-uri xlink:href="http://collectaneabotanica.revistas.csic.es/index.php/collectaneabotanica/article/view/XXXX/XXXX"/>
			<abstract>
				<title>ABSTRACT</title>
				<p>
					<italic>Medicago sinskiae</italic> appears to be a very rare species in the Iranian flora with only a few records in the last three decades. Eight populations (62 individuals) of <italic>M. sinskiae</italic>, one population of <italic>M. rigidula</italic> (seven individuals), and one population of <italic>M. constricta</italic> (five individuals) from western and southwestern Iran were analyzed for microsatellite data based on newly designed SSR primers using NGS technology. The PCoA, Clustering and Structure analyses showed no geographical pattern of genetically designated clusters. Our results showed that <italic>M. sinskiae</italic> is mainly an inbreeder. It is assumed that high levels of gene flow (<italic>Nm</italic>) and generation of genetically homogenous populations seem to be more affected by fast dispersal and not localized gene flow. Extensive collections recently made from the western and southwestern Iran showed that its presence is increasing. Finally, our results indicate that the species is segregated from its very close relatives <italic>M. rigidula</italic> and <italic>M. constricta </italic>in Iran.</p>
			</abstract>
			<trans-abstract xml:lang="es">
				<title>RESUMEN</title>
				<p>
					<italic>Medicago sinskiae</italic> es considerada una especie rara en la flora iraní con únicamente unas pocas citas en las tres últimas décadas. Se han muestreado ocho poblaciones (62 individuos) de <italic>M. sinskiae</italic>, una población de <italic>M. rigidula</italic> (siete individuos) y una población de <italic>M. constricta</italic> (cinco individuos) en el oeste y el suroeste de Irán que han sido analizadas con marcadores microsatélite. Se han utilizado nuevos <italic>primers</italic> obtenidos con tecnología NGS. Los análisis de PCoA, Clustering y Structure no muestran un patrón geográfico para los clústeres genéticos. Los resultados muestran que <italic>M. sinskiae</italic> es principalmente una especie autógama. Se asume que los altos niveles de flujo genético (<italic>Nm</italic>) y la homogeneidad genética poblacional están afectados por una rápida dispersión y un flujo genético no localizado. Recolecciones extensivas realizadas recientemente en el oeste y el suroeste de Iran muestran que el rango de distribución esta especie se está incrementando. Finalmente, nuestros resultados indican que <italic>M. sinskiae</italic> está diferenciada de las especies <italic>M. rigidula</italic> y <italic>M. constricta</italic> en Irán.</p>
			</trans-abstract>
			<kwd-group>
				<kwd>annual medics</kwd>
				<kwd>
					<italic>Medicago</italic>
				</kwd>
				<kwd>microsatellites</kwd>
				<kwd>population genetics</kwd>
			</kwd-group>
			<kwd-group xml:lang="es">
				<kwd>genética de poblaciones</kwd>
				<kwd>marcadores microsatélite</kwd>
				<kwd>
					<italic> Medicago</italic> anuales</kwd>
			</kwd-group>
			<counts>
				<fig-count count="8"/>
				<table-count count="6"/>
				<ref-count count="51"/>
				<page-count count="16"/>
			</counts>
		</article-meta>
	</front>
	<body>
		<sec id="sec-1-002">
			<title>INTRODUCTION</title>
			<p>The genus <italic>Medicago</italic> L. (Fabaceae) has more than 80 annual or perennial species mainly distributed around the Mediterranean Basin (<xref
					ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-40-e002">Small, 2011</xref>). <italic>Medicago sinskiae</italic> Uljanova, the subject of this study, is a very poorly known annual herb, with the following key characteristics. The mainly simple-hair pubescent stems are usually 15–25 cm (rarely up to 40 cm) long, prostrate to ascending, branched from base. The stipules are 2–4 mm, rarely 5 mm long, dentate to laciniate. Each peduncle bears 1–3 (rarely up to 5) flowers. The flowers are 3–6 mm in length, with pubescent calyx and yellow or orange-yellow corolla. The mature pods are ovoid, cylindrical, or discoid, pubescent with both simple and gland-tipped hairs, 4–8 mm long, 4–6 mm wide, with 2.5–5 coils, spineless or with spines up to 4 mm long, hardened at maturity with some gaps often present between coils (<xref
					ref-type="fig" rid="fig-1-e002">Fig. 1</xref>). Seeds are 1.75–2.5 mm long, 1–2 per coil, separated by spongy fruit partitions, smooth in surface, yellow to yellow-brown in color, with the radicle about half as long as the length of the seed. Flowering starts in early April and the fruits mature in May and June (<xref
					ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-40-e002">Small, 2011</xref>). Only plants with spineless fruits have been reported from Turkmenistan (<xref
					ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-45-e002">Uljanova, 1964</xref>; <xref
					ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-41-e002">Small &amp; Brookes, 1991</xref>). Mehregan <italic>et al.</italic> (<xref
					ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-31-e002">2002</xref>) reported both spineless and spiny plants in Iran, with the spines up to 3.5 mm long and usually hooked at the apex.</p>
			<!-- FIGURA 1 -->
			<fig id="fig-1-e002">
				<label>Figure 1</label>
				<caption>
					<title>Variation of pods of <italic>Medicago sinskiae</italic> as seen in selected samples from some populations. See <xref
							ref-type="table" rid="taw-1-e002">Table 1</xref> for abbreviations.</title>
				</caption>
				<graphic id="gra-1-e002" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
					xlink:href="F1.png"/>
			</fig>
			<p>
				<italic>Medicago sinskiae</italic> was first described from the western Kopet-Dagh (Turkmenistan) by Uljanova (<xref
					ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-45-e002">1964</xref>) based on very limited material from a locality in Turkmenistan (southwestern Turkmenia, Karal-Kalin, 10th western Kopet-Dag, Kuraty Canyon of the Sumbar-Chandyrskii watershed ridge, river slope, debris cone, 700 m, 1961). It was rarely accepted by botanists for nearly three decades until it was tentatively recognized by Small &amp; Brookes (<xref
					ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-41-e002">1991</xref>) based on the specimens grown from the seeds of the type collection. They suggested that <italic>M. sinskiae</italic> was a distinctive species, derived from <italic>M. rigidula </italic>(L.) All–<italic>M. rigiduloides</italic> E. Small complex and was not related to other species of <italic>Medicago</italic> (<xref
					ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-41-e002">Small &amp; Brookes, 1991</xref>). The chromosome number of both <italic>M. rigidula</italic> and <italic>M. sinskiae</italic> are <italic>n</italic> = 7 and 8 (<xref
					ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-18-e002">Heyn, 1963</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr"
					rid="ref-41-e002">Small &amp; Brookes, 1991</xref>). Like many other annual species of <italic>Medicago</italic> with small flowers, <italic>M. sinskiae</italic> seems to be largely an inbreeder (<xref
					ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-32-e002">Novoselova, 2003</xref>; <xref
					ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-40-e002">Small, 2011</xref>).</p>
			<p>For nearly four decades no further samples of <italic>M. sinskiae</italic> were collected again. Mehregan <italic>et al.</italic> (<xref
					ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-31-e002">2002</xref>) reported some material from western Iran, hundreds of kilometers away from the type locality. Until collections made from the Zagrosian region of western Iran by Mehregan <italic>et al.</italic> (<xref
					ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-31-e002">2002</xref>), the only known population of<italic> M. sinskiae</italic> was the type collection, and it was thought the species was only endemic to Kopet-Dagh. Based on morphological similarities, Mehregan <italic>et al.</italic> (<xref
					ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-31-e002">2002</xref>) treated <italic>M. sinskiae</italic>, <italic>M. constricta </italic>Durieu, <italic>M. rigidula</italic> and <italic>M. rigiduloides</italic> as one species. Using ITS marker, Zareei <italic>et al.</italic> (<xref
					ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-50-e002">2020</xref>) proposed that <italic>M. sinskiae</italic> is a separate species, sister to <italic>M. rigidula</italic> and <italic>M. rigiduloides</italic>. Furthermore, in many regional floras, both <italic>M. rigidula</italic> and <italic>M. rigiduloides</italic> are collectively treated as <italic>M. rigidula</italic> (<xref
					ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-04-e002">Bayat <italic>et al.</italic>, 2021</xref>).</p>
			<p>Different markers are available for studying populations of intra and inter species. SSR (simple sequence repeats) or microsatellites are widely used in studying the structure of plant populations and genetic diversity (<xref
					ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-07-e002">Chabane <italic>et al.</italic>, 2008</xref>; <xref
					ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-12-e002">Enayat Avval, 2017</xref>). The codominant SSRs are among the most reliable markers in population genetics studies (<xref
					ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-15-e002">Freeland, 2020</xref>). Next generation sequencing (NGS) technology is frequently used to identify microsatellite regions and develop SSR primers (<xref
					ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-38-e002">Shendure &amp; Ji, 2008</xref>; <xref
					ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-48-e002">Yang <italic>et al.</italic>, 2015</xref>; <xref
					ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-11-e002">Emami-Tabatabaei <italic>et al.</italic>, 2021</xref>).</p>
			<p>Our close examination of material recently collected from Iran showed that <italic>M. sinskiae</italic> has a wider distribution in Iran. This study aims to use SSR markers identified by NGS technologies to clarify the genetic structure of this species at population level.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec id="sec-2-002">
			<title>MATERIALS AND METHODS</title>
			<sec id="sec-2-1-002">
				<title>
					<bold>Sample collection</bold>
				</title>
				<p>In total, pods of 74 individuals including 62 individuals from eight populations of <italic>M. sinskiae, </italic>five individuals from a single population of <italic>M. constricta</italic> and seven individuals from a single population of <italic>M. rigidula</italic> were collected from western and southwestern Iran in July 2017 (<xref
						ref-type="table" rid="taw-1-e002">Table 1</xref>). Considering the limited occurrence of <italic>M. sinskiae</italic>, the restricted population size, and the criterion of individuals of each population being sampled at 20 m minimum intervals, no more effective number of individuals could be gathered. We could not find any material from Turkmenistan. All collected samples were identified and labeled based on authoritative identification keys (<xref
						ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-19-e002">Heyn, 1984</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr"
						rid="ref-42-e002">Small &amp; Jomphe, 1989</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr"
						rid="ref-31-e002">Mehregan <italic>et al.</italic>, 2002</xref>; <xref
						ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-40-e002">Small, 2011</xref>). Six to eight seeds of each individual were cultivated in separate pots on a research farm in southwestern Iran with similar ecological conditions to their natural habitats. Samples were taken at different growth stages up until fully ripened pods were developed. Total DNA was extracted from young leaves. Morphological examinations were performed on the fully grown plants and pods. Voucher specimens were deposited at IAUH (Islamic Azad University Herbarium). </p>
				<!-- INICIO TABLA I -->
				<table-wrap id="taw-1-e002" orientation="portrait" position="float">
					<label>Table 1</label>
					<caption>
						<title>List of populations (“Pop.”) of <italic>Medicago sinskiae</italic>, <italic>M. constricta</italic>, and <italic>M. rigidula</italic> studied in this paper.</title>
					</caption>
					<table id="tab-1-e002" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
						<thead>
							<tr>
								<th>
									<bold>Species</bold>
								</th>
								<th>
									<bold>Pop.</bold>
								</th>
								<th>
									<bold>No. of individuals</bold>
								</th>
								<th>
									<bold>Locality</bold>
								</th>
								<th>
									<bold>Elevation, Coordinates</bold>
								</th>
								<th>
									<bold>Herbarium number</bold>
								</th>
							</tr>
						</thead>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td>
									<italic>M. sinskiae</italic>
								</td>
								<td>
							ABD
						</td>
								<td>
							10
						</td>
								<td>
							Iran, Ilam: Abdanan, Kabir kuh
						</td>
								<td>
							1000 m; 49º 25.531’ E; 33º 0.263’ N
						</td>
								<td>
							IAUH-14972
						</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>
									<italic>M. sinskiae</italic>
								</td>
								<td>
							BSN
						</td>
								<td>
							8
						</td>
								<td>
							Iran, Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad: 50 km from Gachsaran toward Shiraz
						</td>
								<td>
							900 m; 51º 13.92’ E; 30º 19.80’ N
						</td>
								<td>
							IAUH-15012
						</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>
									<italic>M. sinskiae</italic>
								</td>
								<td>
							FTH
						</td>
								<td>
							10
						</td>
								<td>
							Iran, Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad: Gachsaran, 30 km from Basht towards Choram, the road to the village Fath
						</td>
								<td>
							1100 m; 51º 51.54’ E; 30º 35.04’ N
						</td>
								<td>
							IAUH-15013
						</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>
									<italic>M. sinskiae</italic>
								</td>
								<td>
							SPD
						</td>
								<td>
							5
						</td>
								<td>
							Iran, Lurestan: Sepid-Dasht, 5 km from Sepid-Dasht to Khorram-Abad
						</td>
								<td>
							1300 m; 48º 51.778’ E; 33º 13.175’ N
						</td>
								<td>
							IAUH-14965
						</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>
									<italic>M. sinskiae</italic>
								</td>
								<td>
							KHR
						</td>
								<td>
							5
						</td>
								<td>
							Iran, Lurestan: Khorram-Abad, 35 km from Khorram-Abad to Pol-Dokhtar
						</td>
								<td>
							940 m; 47º 57.328’ E; 33º 57.121’ N
						</td>
								<td>
							IAUH-14958
						</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>
									<italic>M. sinskiae</italic>
								</td>
								<td>
							KHW
						</td>
								<td>
							9
						</td>
								<td>
							Iran, Lurestan: Khorram-Abad, 5 km from Khorram-Abad to Kohdasht
						</td>
								<td>
							1220 m; 48º 15.164’ E; 33º 28.917’ N
						</td>
								<td>
							IAUH-15016
						</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>
									<italic>M. sinskiae</italic>
								</td>
								<td>
							PLS
						</td>
								<td>
							5
						</td>
								<td>
							Iran, Lurestan: Pol-Dokhtar, 5 km from Pol-Dokhtar to Andimeshk 
						</td>
								<td>
							800 m; 47º 42.448’ E; 33º 6.480’ N
						</td>
								<td>
							IAUH-15003
						</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>
									<italic>M. sinskiae</italic>
								</td>
								<td>
							SPC
						</td>
								<td>
							10
						</td>
								<td>
							Iran, Lurestan: Sepid-Dasht, 15k m from Sepid-Dasht to Khorram-Abad
						</td>
								<td>
							1280 m; 48º 50.649’ E; 33º 13.292’ N
						</td>
								<td>
							IAUH-14971
						</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>
									<italic>M. constricta</italic>
								</td>
								<td>
							-
						</td>
								<td>
							5
						</td>
								<td>
							Iran, Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad: 50 km from Gachsaran toward Shiraz
						</td>
								<td>
							900 m; 51º 13.92’ E; 30º 19.80’ N
						</td>
								<td>
							IAUH-15012-C
						</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>
									<italic>M. rigidula</italic>
								</td>
								<td>
							-
						</td>
								<td>
							7
						</td>
								<td>
							Iran, Lurestan: Sepid-Dasht, 30 km from Sepid-Dasht to Khorram-Abad
						</td>
								<td>
							1940 m; 48º 44.719’ E; 33º 16.024’ N
						</td>
								<td>
							IAUH-14962
						</td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
				</table-wrap>
			</sec>
			<sec id="sec-2-2-002">
				<title>
					<bold>DNA extraction</bold>
				</title>
				<p>Total genomic DNA was extracted from young leaves dried in silica gel using CTAB (cetyltrimethylammonium bromide) method of Doyle &amp; Doyle (<xref
						ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-09-e002">1987</xref>) employing Nucleospin© Plants kits (Machery-Nagel, Germany) after manufacturer’s instructions. Success of DNA extraction was initially checked on 1% agarose gel. Density and purity of extracted DNA were examined on a NanoDrop™ 2000 (Thermo Scientific). </p>
			</sec>
			<sec id="sec-2-3-002">
				<title>
					<bold>Identification of microsatellite loci via Next Generation Sequencing</bold>
				</title>
				<p>Method of Yang <italic>et al.</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr"
						rid="ref-48-e002">2015</xref>) was used to identify and develop SSR markers. 100 ng of the genomic DNA of a single sample was used to generate an Illumina DNA library. After DNA was fragmented, repaired at the ends, “A-tailed”, and ligated to the TruSeq adapters, the library was amplified in eight cycles. The average size of the library was 670 bp, corresponding to an average integral length of 500 bp. Sequencing of the “library” was carried out in an Illumina-MiSeq system (Illumina, San Diego, CA) with 300 bp each in the “paired-end” mode. In order to remove residues of adapter sequences, the overlapping “paired-end-reads” were first trimmed at the ends. The quality score was set to at least 20. FLASH software (<xref
						ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-29-e002">Magoč &amp; Salzberg, 2011</xref>) was used to assemble the reads. The resulting sequences were bioinformatically analyzed for existing microsatellites (<xref
						ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-14-e002">Faircloth, 2008</xref>). Examination of 817,510 potential loci with any tandem repeat were performed with following criteria: mismatch = 0, motive-length = 3–5 and length of repeats = 40–185. </p>
			</sec>
			<sec id="sec-2-4-002">
				<title>
					<bold>Primer design and test of polymorphism</bold>
				</title>
				<p>Primer3 software (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-26-e002">Koressaar <italic>et al.</italic>, 2018</xref>) was used to design primers for 513 out of 2410 eligible loci suitable for primer designing with the following criteria: PCR-product size = 150–350 bp, primer length = 18–22 bp, and TM-value = 58–62°C. Primer pairs were synthesized for 124 loci and tested on 12 samples for suitability. Those primer pairs which yielded unique PCR fragments were tested on a batch of four individuals. In the best case those primers should result in different unique fragments in each individual. PCR products from individuals were sequenced to confirm the tandem repeat pattern. Out of the 124 primer pairs only six polymorphic loci could be detected. Primers with different labeling were synthesized (<xref
						ref-type="table" rid="taw-2-e002">Table 2</xref>). In order to avoid the possible problems with null alleles, we tried to improve our methods by using labelled primers, finding the best annealing temperature, and sequencing the PCR products for estimating the product size (<xref
						ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-08-e002">Dakin &amp; Avise, 2004</xref>).</p>
				<!-- INICIO TABLA II -->
				<table-wrap id="taw-2-e002" orientation="portrait" position="float">
					<label>Table 2</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Name and specification of SSR primer pairs developed and used in this study. Asterisk indicates labeled tail.</title>
					</caption>
					<table id="tab-2-e002" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
						<thead>
							<tr>
								<th>
									<bold>Locus</bold>
								</th>
								<th/>
								<th>
									<bold>Primer sequence</bold>
								</th>
								<th>
									<bold>Labeling</bold>
								</th>
								<th>
									<bold>Motive</bold>
								</th>
								<th>
									<bold>Annealing temperature (°C)</bold>
								</th>
							</tr>
						</thead>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td rowspan="2">
							MED-01
						</td>
								<td>
							For
						</td>
								<td>
							ACCGTCGCTTCGAGTTTCTA
						</td>
								<td rowspan="2">
							Atto 550
						</td>
								<td rowspan="2">
							AAG
						</td>
								<td rowspan="2">
							59
						</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>
							Rev
						</td>
								<td>
							*TCCTTGACCAACAACAGCAG
						</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td rowspan="2">
							MED-02
						</td>
								<td>
							For
						</td>
								<td>
							CGGAAGTGACGTTAACGGAT
						</td>
								<td rowspan="2">
							HEX
						</td>
								<td rowspan="2">
							AAT
						</td>
								<td rowspan="2">
							59
						</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>
							Rev
						</td>
								<td>
							*CCACATCTTGAATTCTAGCCC
						</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td rowspan="2">
							MED-03
						</td>
								<td>
							For
						</td>
								<td>
							GGTAAACGACCAATCACAAGG
						</td>
								<td rowspan="2">
							FAM
						</td>
								<td rowspan="2">
							AAT
						</td>
								<td rowspan="2">
							59.5
						</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>
							Rev
						</td>
								<td>
							*GGGAAATATTGGCTTGGACA
						</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td rowspan="2">
							MED-04
						</td>
								<td>
							For
						</td>
								<td>
							TTGAAAGTTCACAGCAAATCG
						</td>
								<td rowspan="2">
							Atto 565
						</td>
								<td rowspan="2">
							TAT
						</td>
								<td rowspan="2">
							59
						</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>
							Rev
						</td>
								<td>
							*TTGACAGAGTTGCAGCATCA
						</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td rowspan="2">
							MED-05
						</td>
								<td>
							For
						</td>
								<td>
							GCTTGCCATAATTGTTTGCC
						</td>
								<td rowspan="2">
							Atto 550
						</td>
								<td rowspan="2">
							GT
						</td>
								<td rowspan="2">
							59.9
						</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>
							Rev
						</td>
								<td>
							*AAATGCTCTAGAGGGCCACA
						</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td rowspan="2">
							MED-06
						</td>
								<td>
							For
						</td>
								<td>
							TCAGAAGTGATATGCAGCGG
						</td>
								<td rowspan="2">
							FAM
						</td>
								<td rowspan="2">
							AG
						</td>
								<td rowspan="2">
							60
						</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>
							Rev
						</td>
								<td>
							*GGTGTGCTTGAGCAATTTGA
						</td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
				</table-wrap>
			</sec>
			<sec id="sec-2-5-002">
				<title>
					<bold>PCR and fragment analysis</bold>
				</title>
				<p>Polymerase chain reactions (PCR) were carried out in 25 μl reaction volumes containing 5 μl of 5× PCR-buffer, 2 μl of MgCl<sub>2</sub> (25mM), 2 μl of dNTPs (2.5 mM), 0.1 μl of Taq-Polymerase (1.25 U), 1 μl of forward primer (10 pmol/μl), 1 μl of reverse primer (10 pmol/μl), 1 μl of genomic DNA (~15 ng), and 12.9 μl of ddH<sub>2</sub>O. The PCR reactions were performed on a Labcycler Gradient (SensoQuest GmbH, Göttingen, Germany) under the following conditions: initial denaturation at 95°C for 180 s, 34 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 30 s, annealing at primer specific temperature for 30 s and extension at 72°C for 30 s, and a final extension at 72°C for 300 s. PCR products of MED-01/MED-02/MED-03 and MED-04/MED-05/MED-06 primer pairs were pooled separately. Two μl of each pool was mixed with 7.75 μl of HiDi formamide (Applied Biosystems) and 0.25 μl ROX-500 internal size standard (Applied Biosystems) and then injected to an 3730xl Applied Biosystems capillary sequencer. Raw data were visualized with GeneMarker v4.0 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Output files were aligned with the ROX-500 size standard using GeneMarker v2.4.2 (GeneMarker, SoftGenetics, State College, PA, USA). Each peak with a signal intensity of more than 1000 was scored as present. The binary matrices (1: presence, 0: absence) of each two primer pools were combined and prepared for further analyses. Some analyses need data to be entered as co-dominant. To do so, allele sizes for each locus were entered in GenAlEx software after publisher’s tutorials.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec id="sec-2-6-002">
				<title>
					<bold>Multivariate analyses</bold>
				</title>
				<p>UPGMA (Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic mean) algorithm of clustering with Dice similarity index as well as PCoA (Principal Coordinate Analysis) analyses of dataset were performed with PAST3 software package (<xref
						ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-17-e002">Hammer <italic>et al.</italic>, 2001</xref>). After circumscribing <italic>M. sinskiae</italic> with UPGMA and PCoA, further analysis was performed on <italic>M. sinskiae </italic>populations only. In POPTREEW software genetic distances were measured and phylogenetic tree was constructed.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec id="sec-2-7-002">
				<title>
					<bold>Analysis of population structure</bold>
				</title>
				<p>Genetic structure of <italic>M. sinkiae</italic> populations was estimated using a Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo model (MCMC) implemented in S<sc>tructure</sc> v2.3.4 (<xref
						ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-35-e002">Pritchard <italic>et al.</italic>, 2000</xref>). The true number of subpopulations (<italic>K</italic>) was calculated using Evanno <italic>et al. </italic>(<xref
						ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-13-e002">2005</xref>) method summarized in CLUMPP_Windows v1.1.2 software (<xref
						ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-22-e002">Jakobsson &amp; Rosenberg, 2007</xref>) on the S<sc>tructure</sc> H<sc>arvester</sc> website (<xref
						ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-10-e002">Earl &amp; vonHoldt, 2012</xref>). It was tested for <italic>K</italic> = 1 to <italic>K</italic> = 8 with 20 independent simulations at 60,000 samplings with a burn-in period of 10,000 first iterations. The final analysis with the resulting <italic>K</italic> (= 3) was conducted by 1,250,000 repetitions after a burn-in of first 500,000 replications. Individuals with at least 80% probability of membership in a cluster were considered to belong to that cluster. Individuals with probabilities of membership below 80% were interpreted as a hybrid genotype.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec id="sec-2-8-002">
				<title>
					<bold>Estimating frequencies, diversity and population structure</bold>
				</title>
				<p>Different parameters of <italic>M. sinskiae</italic> populations including the haploid number of migrants (<italic>Nm</italic>), number of different alleles (<italic>N</italic>
					<sub>a</sub>), number of effective alleles (<italic>N</italic>
					<sub>e</sub>), number of private alleles (<italic>N</italic>
					<sub>p</sub>), expected heterozygosity (<italic>H</italic>
					<sub>e</sub>), unbiased expected heterozygosity (u<italic>H</italic>
					<sub>e</sub>), and Shannon information Index (<italic>I</italic>) for each population were calculated using GenAlEx v6.503 (<xref
						ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-34-e002">Peakall &amp; Smouse, 2012</xref>) and POPGENE (<xref
						ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-49-e002">Yeh <italic>et al.</italic>, 1999</xref>). <italic>F</italic>-statistics employ inbreeding coefficients to describe the partitioning of genetic variation within and among populations and can be calculated at three different levels (<italic>F</italic>
					<sub>IS</sub>, <italic>F</italic>
					<sub>ST</sub>, <italic>F</italic>
					<sub>IT</sub>). GenAlEx was also used to calculate the mean of haploid number of migrants or gene flow (<italic>Nm</italic>), genetic differentiation between subpopulations (<italic>F</italic>
					<sub>ST</sub>), inbreeding coefficient of an individual relative to the subpopulation (<italic>F</italic>
					<sub>IS</sub>), and inbreeding coefficient of an individual relative to the total population (<italic>F</italic>
					<sub>IT</sub> and <italic>G</italic>
					<sub>ST</sub>) for each primer pair (locus). <italic>G</italic>
					<sub>ST</sub> is assumed to be an analogue of <italic>F</italic>
					<sub>ST</sub>, and <italic>G</italic>
					<sub>ST</sub> is equivalent to <italic>F</italic>
					<sub>ST</sub> when there are only two alleles per locus and is the weighted average of <italic>F</italic>
					<sub>ST </sub>for all alleles in case of multiple alleles per locus (<xref
						ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-15-e002">Freeland, 2020</xref>). <italic>F</italic>
					<sub>IS</sub> was estimated by dividing (<italic>H</italic>
					<sub>e</sub> – <italic>H</italic>
					<sub>o</sub>)/<italic>H</italic>
					<sub>e</sub> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-33-e002">Pagnotta, 2018</xref>). The selfing rates (<italic>S</italic>) were calculated by dividing 2<italic>F</italic>
					<sub>IS</sub>/ (1+ <italic>F</italic>
					<sub>IS</sub>) in our populations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-06-e002">Burkil <italic>et al.</italic>, 2017</xref>).</p>
				<p>The polymorphism information content (PIC) was also calculated manually in spreadsheet as PIC = 1 – Σ<sup>n</sup>
					<sub>i </sub>= 1<italic>p</italic>
					<sub>i</sub>
					<sup>2</sup>, where <italic>p</italic>
					<sub>i </sub>(i = 1, 2, 3, … <italic>I</italic>) are the frequencies of <italic>i</italic>
					<sup>th </sup>alleles for the given locus and “<italic>i</italic>” is the number of distinct alleles at a locus (<xref
						ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-28-e002">Luo <italic>et al.</italic>, 2019</xref>). Genetic distances and genetic diversity with pairwise test and Nei’s Genetic Distance (GD) were calculated using POPGENE and GenAlEx. Data were analyzed with POPTREE2 (<xref
						ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-44-e002">Takezaki <italic>et al.</italic>, 2009</xref>). A neighbor-joining (NJ) method based on Nei’s genetic distances using POPTREE2 with 1000 replicates of bootstrapping was used to illustrate the relationships between populations. The SplitsTree v4.15.1 software (<xref
						ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-21-e002">Huson &amp; Bryant, 2006</xref>) was used to calculate the genetic distances for a split neighbor net. The genetic difference within and among the studied populations (<xref
						ref-type="table" rid="taw-1-e002">Table 1</xref>) as well as regions (Region 1, western Iran: populations ABD, KHW, KHR, SPC, SPD, and PLS; Region 2, southwestern Iran: populations FTH, BSN) was tested by AMOVA (Analysis of Molecular Variance) with 1000 permutations using GenAlEx. In order to evaluate the impact of genetic distance and geographical distance on population differentiation, a Mantel test (<xref
						ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-30-e002">Mantel, 1967</xref>) was performed to correlate two matrixes of genetic distance based on <italic>F</italic>
					<sub>ST</sub> and Nei’s genetic distance using GenAlEx.</p>
			</sec>
		</sec>
		<sec id="sec-3-002">
			<title>RESULTS</title>
			<sec id="sec-3-1-002">
				<title>
					<bold>Multivariate analyses</bold>
				</title>
				<p>The UPGMA dendrogram of SSR data with Dice similarity index showed that the 74 individuals sampled fell into three distinct groups (<xref
						ref-type="fig" rid="fig-2-e002">Fig. 2</xref>). Each of these groups represented the individuals of a different species. Similar results were also observed in the PCoA analysis of the same dataset (<xref
						ref-type="fig" rid="fig-3-e002">Fig. 3</xref>). In both analyses, all individuals of <italic>M. sinskiae</italic> were circumscribed as a single distinct group and therefore is in accordance with the proposal of Small &amp; Brookes (<xref
						ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-41-e002">1991</xref>) and the results of Zareei <italic>et al.</italic> (<xref
						ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-50-e002">2020</xref>). Further analyses were performed on the 62 individuals of <italic>M. sinskiae</italic> (see Figs. 4–10 and Tables 4–6). </p>
				<!-- FIGURA 2 -->
				<fig id="fig-2-e002">
					<label>Figure 2</label>
					<caption>
						<title>UPGMA tree based on the SSR analysis of 74 individuals of <italic>Medicago sinskiae</italic>, <italic>M. constricta</italic> and <italic>M. rigidula</italic>.</title>
					</caption>
					<graphic id="gra-2-e002" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
						xlink:href="F2.png"/>
				</fig>
				<!-- FIGURA 3 -->
				<fig id="fig-3-e002">
					<label>Figure 3</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) plot of 74 individuals of <italic>Medicago sinskiae</italic>, <italic>M. constricta</italic> and <italic>M. rigidula</italic>.</title>
					</caption>
					<graphic id="gra-3-e002" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
						xlink:href="F3.png"/>
				</fig>
			</sec>
			<sec id="sec-3-2-002">
				<title>
					<bold>Genetic diversity</bold>
				</title>
				<p>A total of 19 alleles were detected from the analysis of six loci (<xref
						ref-type="table" rid="taw-3-e002">Table 3</xref>). The number of alleles per locus ranged from 2 to 6. The mean of Shannon Index (<italic>I</italic>) for eight populations was 0.458 (<xref
						ref-type="table" rid="taw-4-e002">Table 4</xref>). The Shannon Index (<italic>I</italic>) values were higher than expected heterozygosity (<italic>H</italic>
					<sub>e</sub>) values. Population ABD showed the maximum values of <italic>N</italic>
					<sub>a</sub> (2.667), <italic>N</italic>
					<sub>e</sub> (1.870), <italic>I</italic> (0.701), <italic>H</italic>
					<sub>e</sub> (0.418) and u<italic>H</italic>
					<sub>e</sub> (0.440), and population KHR showed the minimum values of <italic>N</italic>
					<sub>a</sub> (1.333), <italic>N</italic>
					<sub>e</sub> (1.308), <italic>I</italic> (0.224), <italic>H</italic>
					<sub>o</sub> (0), <italic>H</italic>
					<sub>e</sub> (0.160) and u<italic>H</italic>
					<sub>e</sub> (0.178). The mean of observed heterozygosity (<italic>H</italic>
					<sub>o</sub>), expected heterozygosity (<italic>H</italic>
					<sub>e</sub>), unbiased expected heterozygosity (u<italic>H</italic>
					<sub>e</sub>), number of different alleles (<italic>N</italic>
					<sub>a</sub>), number of effective alleles (<italic>N</italic>
					<sub>e</sub>) and fixation Index (<italic>F</italic>) for all eight populations were 0.040, 0.296, 0.317, 1.917, 1.535, and 0.849 respectively (<xref
						ref-type="table" rid="taw-4-e002">Table 4</xref>). The <italic>F</italic>
					<sub>IS </sub>value ranged from 0.582 to 1 in eight populations and population BSN showed the lowest level of <italic>F</italic>
					<sub>IS </sub>(0.582), compared to the highest levels of <italic>F</italic>
					<sub>IS</sub> (1) observed in populations PLS and KHR. Selfing rate (<italic>S</italic>) ranged from 0.735 to 1 with a mean value of 0.928 (<xref
						ref-type="table" rid="taw-4-e002">Table 4</xref>). Nei’s genetic distance (GD) results (<xref
						ref-type="table" rid="taw-5-e002">Table 5</xref>) showed the populations with more similar alleles having smaller genetic distances. Populations KHW and SPC both from Lurestan province were the most similar (Nei’s GD = 0.013). The largest amount of genetic distance was observed between populations BSN and ABD (Nei’s GD = 0.223).</p>
				<!-- INICIO TABLA III -->
				<table-wrap id="taw-3-e002" orientation="portrait" position="float">
					<label>Table 3</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Genetic diversity at six SSR loci in 62 individuals of <italic>Medicago sinskiae</italic> from Iran. PIC: polymorphism information content; <italic>Nm</italic>: haploid number of migrants or gene flow; <italic>F</italic>
							<sub>ST:</sub> genetic differentiation among populations; <italic>F</italic>
							<sub>IS</sub>: inbreeding coefficient of an individual relative to the subpopulation; <italic>F</italic>
							<sub>it</sub>: inbreeding coefficient of an individual relative to the total population; <italic>G</italic>
							<sub>ST</sub>: among-population genetic differentiation.</title>
					</caption>
					<table id="tab-3-e002" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
						<thead>
							<tr>
								<th>
							Name of PCR product 
						</th>
								<th>
							PIC value
						</th>
								<th>
							Number of alleles
						</th>
								<th>
									<italic>Nm</italic>
								</th>
								<th>
									<italic>F</italic>
									<sub>ST</sub>
								</th>
								<th>
									<italic>F</italic>
									<sub>IS</sub>
								</th>
								<th>
									<italic>F</italic>
									<sub>IT</sub>
								</th>
								<th>
									<italic>G</italic>
									<sub>ST</sub>
								</th>
							</tr>
						</thead>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td>
							Locus MED-01
						</td>
								<td>
							0.196
						</td>
								<td>
							2
						</td>
								<td>
							1.953
						</td>
								<td>
							0.113
						</td>
								<td>
							0.505
						</td>
								<td>
							0.562
						</td>
								<td>
							0.504
						</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>
							Locus MED-02
						</td>
								<td>
							0.635
						</td>
								<td>
							2
						</td>
								<td>
							5.704
						</td>
								<td>
							0.042
						</td>
								<td>
							0.973
						</td>
								<td>
							0.974
						</td>
								<td>
							0.951
						</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>
							Locus MED-03
						</td>
								<td>
							0.923
						</td>
								<td>
							2
						</td>
								<td>
							1.022
						</td>
								<td>
							0.197
						</td>
								<td>
							0.598
						</td>
								<td>
							0.677
						</td>
								<td>
							0.145
						</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>
							Locus MED-04
						</td>
								<td>
							0.856
						</td>
								<td>
							4
						</td>
								<td>
							0.667
						</td>
								<td>
							0.273
						</td>
								<td>
							0.967
						</td>
								<td>
							0.976
						</td>
								<td>
							0.083
						</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>
							Locus MED-05
						</td>
								<td>
							0.999
						</td>
								<td>
							3
						</td>
								<td>
							1.251
						</td>
								<td>
							0.167
						</td>
								<td>
							0.924
						</td>
								<td>
							0.936
						</td>
								<td>
							0.343
						</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>
							Locus MED-06
						</td>
								<td>
							0.998
						</td>
								<td>
							6
						</td>
								<td>
							1.395
						</td>
								<td>
							0.152
						</td>
								<td>
							0.951
						</td>
								<td>
							0.959
						</td>
								<td>
							0.479
						</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>
							Mean
						</td>
								<td>
							0.767
						</td>
								<td>
							3.1
						</td>
								<td>
							1.999
						</td>
								<td>
							0.157
						</td>
								<td>
							0.820
						</td>
								<td>
							0.847
						</td>
								<td>
							0.402
						</td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
				</table-wrap>
				<!-- INICIO TABLA IV -->
				<table-wrap id="taw-4-e002" orientation="portrait" position="float">
					<label>Table 4</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Summary statistics for eight populations of <italic>Medicago sinskiae</italic> from Iran. <italic>N</italic>: number of individuals; <italic>N</italic>
							<sub>a</sub>: number of different alleles; <italic>N</italic>
							<sub>p</sub>: number of private alleles; <italic>N</italic>
							<sub>e</sub>: number of effective alleles; <italic>I</italic>: Shanon information Index; <italic>H</italic>
							<sub>o</sub>: observed heterozygosity; <italic>H</italic>
							<sub>e</sub>: expected heterozygosity; u<italic>H</italic>
							<sub>e</sub>: unbiased expected heterozygosity; <italic>F</italic>
							<sub>IS</sub>: inbreeding coefficient; <italic>S</italic>: selfing rate, <italic>F</italic>: fixation Index; <italic>P</italic>: polymorphism percentage. See Table 1 for abbreviations to population names.</title>
					</caption>
					<table id="tab-4-e002" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
						<thead>
							<tr>
								<th>
									<bold>Population</bold>
								</th>
								<th>
									<bold>N</bold>
								</th>
								<th>
									<bold>
										<italic>N<sub>p</sub>
										</italic>
									</bold>
								</th>
								<th>
									<bold>
										<italic>N<sub>a</sub>
										</italic>
									</bold>
								</th>
								<th>
									<bold>
										<italic>N<sub>e</sub>
										</italic>
									</bold>
								</th>
								<th>
									<bold>
										<italic>I</italic>
									</bold>
								</th>
								<th>
									<bold>
										<italic>H<sub>o</sub>
										</italic>
									</bold>
								</th>
								<th>
									<bold>
										<italic>H<sub>e</sub>
										</italic>
									</bold>
								</th>
								<th>
									<bold>u</bold>
									<bold>
										<italic>H<sub>e</sub>
										</italic>
									</bold>
								</th>
								<th>
									<bold>
										<italic>F<sub>IS</sub>
										</italic>
									</bold>
								</th>
								<th>
									<bold>
										<italic>S</italic>
									</bold>
								</th>
								<th>
									<bold>
										<italic>F</italic>
									</bold>
								</th>
								<th>
									<bold>
										<italic>P</italic>
									</bold>
								</th>
							</tr>
						</thead>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td>
							ABD
						</td>
								<td>
							10
						</td>
								<td>
							0.167
						</td>
								<td>
							2.667
						</td>
								<td>
							1.870
						</td>
								<td>
							0.701
						</td>
								<td>
							0.067
						</td>
								<td>
							0.418
						</td>
								<td>
							0.440
						</td>
								<td>
							0.839
						</td>
								<td>
							0.912
						</td>
								<td>
							0.849
						</td>
								<td>
							100%
						</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>
							KHW
						</td>
								<td>
							9
						</td>
								<td>
							0.167
						</td>
								<td>
							2.333
						</td>
								<td>
							1.726
						</td>
								<td>
							0.637
						</td>
								<td>
							0.019
						</td>
								<td>
							0.400
						</td>
								<td>
							0.424
						</td>
								<td>
							0.952
						</td>
								<td>
							0.975
						</td>
								<td>
							0.933
						</td>
								<td>
							100%
						</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>
							SPD
						</td>
								<td>
							5
						</td>
								<td>
							0
						</td>
								<td>
							1.833
						</td>
								<td>
							1.547
						</td>
								<td>
							0.443
						</td>
								<td>
							0.033
						</td>
								<td>
							0.297
						</td>
								<td>
							0.330
						</td>
								<td>
							0.888
						</td>
								<td>
							0.941
						</td>
								<td>
							0.853
						</td>
								<td>
							66.67%
						</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>
							SPC
						</td>
								<td>
							10
						</td>
								<td>
							0
						</td>
								<td>
							2.333
						</td>
								<td>
							1.646
						</td>
								<td>
							0.601
						</td>
								<td>
							0.100
						</td>
								<td>
							0.378
						</td>
								<td>
							0.398
						</td>
								<td>
							0.735
						</td>
								<td>
							0.847
						</td>
								<td>
							0.639
						</td>
								<td>
							100%
						</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>
							PLS
						</td>
								<td>
							5
						</td>
								<td>
							0
						</td>
								<td>
							1.500
						</td>
								<td>
							1.311
						</td>
								<td>
							0.279
						</td>
								<td>
							0
						</td>
								<td>
							0.187
						</td>
								<td>
							0.207
						</td>
								<td>
							1
						</td>
								<td>
							1
						</td>
								<td>
							1
						</td>
								<td>
							50%
						</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>
							KHR
						</td>
								<td>
							5
						</td>
								<td>
							0.167
						</td>
								<td>
							1.333
						</td>
								<td>
							1.308
						</td>
								<td>
							0.224
						</td>
								<td>
							0
						</td>
								<td>
							0.160
						</td>
								<td>
							0.178
						</td>
								<td>
							1
						</td>
								<td>
							1
						</td>
								<td>
							1
						</td>
								<td>
							33.33%
						</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>
							BSN
						</td>
								<td>
							8
						</td>
								<td>
							0
						</td>
								<td>
							1.667
						</td>
								<td>
							1.419
						</td>
								<td>
							0.370
						</td>
								<td>
							0.104
						</td>
								<td>
							0.249
						</td>
								<td>
							0.265
						</td>
								<td>
							0.582
						</td>
								<td>
							0.735
						</td>
								<td>
							0.615
						</td>
								<td>
							66.67%
						</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>
							FTH
						</td>
								<td>
							10
						</td>
								<td>
							0
						</td>
								<td>
							2
						</td>
								<td>
							1.692
						</td>
								<td>
							0.574
						</td>
								<td>
							0.033
						</td>
								<td>
							0.392
						</td>
								<td>
							0.412
						</td>
								<td>
							0.915
						</td>
								<td>
							0.955
						</td>
								<td>
							0.930
						</td>
								<td>
							100%
						</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>
							Mean
						</td>
								<td>
							7.250
						</td>
								<td>
							0.063
						</td>
								<td>
							1.917
						</td>
								<td>
							1.535
						</td>
								<td>
							0.458
						</td>
								<td>
							0.040
						</td>
								<td>
							0.296
						</td>
								<td>
							0.317
						</td>
								<td>
							0.923
						</td>
								<td>
							0.928
						</td>
								<td>
							0.849
						</td>
								<td>
							77.08%
						</td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
				</table-wrap>
				<!-- INICIO TABLA V -->
				<table-wrap id="taw-5-e002" orientation="portrait" position="float">
					<label>Table 5</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Pairwise Nei’s Genetic Distance (Nei’s GD) between populations of <italic>Medicago sinskiae</italic>.</title>
					</caption>
					<table id="tab-5-e002" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
						<thead>
							<tr>
								<th>
									<bold>Population</bold>
								</th>
								<th/>
								<th/>
								<th colspan="5"/>
								<th/>
							</tr>
						</thead>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td/>
								<td>
							ABD
						</td>
								<td>
							KHW
						</td>
								<td>
							SPD
						</td>
								<td>
							SPC
						</td>
								<td>
							PLS
						</td>
								<td>
							KHR
						</td>
								<td>
							BSN
						</td>
								<td>
							FTH
						</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>
							ABD
						</td>
								<td>
							0
						</td>
								<td/>
								<td/>
								<td/>
								<td/>
								<td/>
								<td/>
								<td/>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>
							KHW
						</td>
								<td>
							0.136
						</td>
								<td>
							0
						</td>
								<td/>
								<td/>
								<td/>
								<td/>
								<td/>
								<td/>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>
							SPD
						</td>
								<td>
							0.115
						</td>
								<td>
							0.022
						</td>
								<td>
							0
						</td>
								<td/>
								<td/>
								<td/>
								<td/>
								<td/>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>
							SPC
						</td>
								<td>
							0.097
						</td>
								<td>
							0.013
						</td>
								<td>
							0.020
						</td>
								<td>
							0
						</td>
								<td/>
								<td/>
								<td/>
								<td/>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>
							PLS
						</td>
								<td>
							0.153
						</td>
								<td>
							0.038
						</td>
								<td>
							0.022
						</td>
								<td>
							0.028
						</td>
								<td>
							0
						</td>
								<td/>
								<td/>
								<td/>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>
							KHR
						</td>
								<td>
							0.187
						</td>
								<td>
							0.094
						</td>
								<td>
							0.075
						</td>
								<td>
							0.078
						</td>
								<td>
							0.033
						</td>
								<td>
							0
						</td>
								<td/>
								<td/>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>
							BSN
						</td>
								<td>
							0.223
						</td>
								<td>
							0.113
						</td>
								<td>
							0.135
						</td>
								<td>
							0.099
						</td>
								<td>
							0.067
						</td>
								<td>
							0.083
						</td>
								<td>
							0
						</td>
								<td/>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>
							FTH
						</td>
								<td>
							0.047
						</td>
								<td>
							0.107
						</td>
								<td>
							0.092
						</td>
								<td>
							0.080
						</td>
								<td>
							0.121
						</td>
								<td>
							0.175
						</td>
								<td>
							0.188
						</td>
								<td>
							0
						</td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
				</table-wrap>
				<p>Mean of polymorphism percentage was 77.08% (<xref ref-type="table"
						rid="taw-4-e002">Table 4</xref>). Although populations ABD, KHW, SPC and FTH showed to be 100% polymorphic, population KHR showed the lowest polymorphism (33.3%) as well as lowest values of genetic parameters (<xref
						ref-type="table" rid="taw-4-e002">Table 4</xref>). Our SSR markers displayed a high level of polymorphism, and this species seems to be a polymorphic plant. Both PIC and <italic>H</italic>
					<sub>e</sub> (= gene diversity) values are measures of genetic diversity, although PIC values are not useful in linkage analyses when determining the inheritance between offspring and parental genotypes, and expected heterozygosity (<italic>H</italic>
					<sub>e</sub>) is useful for haploid markers (<xref ref-type="bibr"
						rid="ref-28-e002">Luo <italic>et al.</italic>, 2019</xref>). The mean of following parameters was observed for six loci: haploid number of migrants or gene flow (<italic>Nm</italic>) = 1.999, coefficient of genetic differentiation among populations (<italic>F</italic>
					<sub>ST</sub>) = 0.157, inbreeding coefficient of an individual relative to the subpopulation (<italic>F</italic>
					<sub>IS</sub>) = 0.820, inbreeding coefficient of an individual relative to the total population (<italic>F</italic>
					<sub>IT</sub>) = 0.847, and among-population genetic differentiation (<italic>G</italic>
					<sub>ST</sub>) = 0.402. Locus MED-02 showed the highest value of <italic>F</italic>
					<sub>IS</sub>
					<sub>,</sub>
					<italic>G</italic>
					<sub>ST</sub> and <italic>Nm</italic> and the highest value of <italic>F</italic>
					<sub>ST</sub> and <italic>F</italic>
					<sub>IT</sub> were observed in locus MED-04 (<xref ref-type="table"
						rid="taw-3-e002">Table 3</xref>). The SSR markers showed the PIC values ranging from 0.196 (locus MED-01) to 0.999 (locus MED-05) (<xref
						ref-type="table" rid="taw-3-e002">Table 3</xref>). Among the primers, locus MED-06 with six alleles had the highest number of polymorphic bands and locus MED-01, MED-02, MED-03 with two alleles had the lowest number of polymorphic bands (<xref
						ref-type="table" rid="taw-3-e002">Table 3</xref>). The PIC value was used to measure the informativeness of primers. Having the highest PIC value (0.999), locus MED-05 showed higher polymorphism and had more impact in differentiation of individuals. The minimum amount of PIC value (0.196) was observed in the monomorphic locus MED-01, which was uniform in all individuals. All other primers were polymorphic (<xref
						ref-type="table" rid="taw-3-e002">Table 3</xref>).</p>
			</sec>
			<sec id="sec-3-3-002">
				<title>
					<bold>Population structure and genetic relationships</bold>
				</title>
				<p>The true number of subpopulations (<italic>K</italic> = 3, <xref
						ref-type="fig" rid="fig-4-e002">Fig. 4</xref>) was obtained using the method of Evanno <italic>et al.</italic> (<xref
						ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-13-e002">2005</xref>). As seen in <xref
						ref-type="fig" rid="fig-4-e002">Fig. 4</xref>, none of the populations seems to be uniformly consisting of a single cluster. All populations had individuals from different genetic clusters. Results of UPGMA clustering analysis showed that there was no major cluster formed by individuals solely from a single population or individuals with geographical proximity (<xref
						ref-type="fig" rid="fig-5-e002">Fig. 5</xref>). Different clusters included individuals from different populations with no geographical proximity. For example, individuals of population SPC were present in all four major clusters A1a, A1b, A2 and B. As seen in Figs. 6 and 7, individuals of different populations were scattered all over the PCoA plot and Neighbor-net network. In accordance with the results of S<sc>tructure</sc> analysis (<xref
						ref-type="fig" rid="fig-4-e002">Fig. 4</xref>), UPGMA clustering dendrogram (<xref
						ref-type="fig" rid="fig-5-e002">Fig. 5</xref>), the PCoA plot (<xref
						ref-type="fig" rid="fig-6-e002">Fig. 6</xref>) and Neighbor-net network (<xref
						ref-type="fig" rid="fig-7-e002">Fig. 7</xref>), none of populations studied were unmixed. Despite being clearly circumscribed when analyzed alongside with <italic>M. rigidula</italic> and <italic>M. constricta</italic>, populations of <italic>M. sinskiae</italic> showed no grouping based on geographical proximity. In POPTREE software genetic distances measured for constructing phylogenetic trees of eight populations showed no relationship based on geographical proximity (<xref
						ref-type="fig" rid="fig-8-e002">Fig. 8</xref>). The AMOVA test was performed (<xref
						ref-type="table" rid="taw-6-e002">Table 6</xref>) to study population differentiation and to estimate the percentage of intrapopulation and interpopulation genetic variation. Most of the genetic variation occurred among individuals (95%). The calculated genetic variation among populations was 5%, and the number for variation among regions was 0% (<xref
						ref-type="table" rid="taw-6-e002">Table 6</xref>). The Mantel test indicated no meaningful correlation between genetic distance and geographical distribution (<italic>R</italic> = -0.019, <italic>P</italic> = 0.659).</p>
				<!-- FIGURA 4 -->
				<fig id="fig-4-e002">
					<label>Figure 4</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Geographical distribution and population structure of <italic>Medicago sinskiae</italic> populations in Iran based on <italic>K</italic> = 3. Magnitude of Delta <italic>K</italic> as a function of <italic>K</italic> = 2–8 is shown at the upper corner on left.</title>
					</caption>
					<graphic id="gra-4-e002" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
						xlink:href="F4.png"/>
				</fig>
				<!-- FIGURA 5 -->
				<fig id="fig-5-e002">
					<label>Figure 5</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic mean (UPGMA) tree based on the SSR analysis of 62 individuals of <italic>Medicago sinskiae</italic> in Iran.</title>
					</caption>
					<graphic id="gra-5-e002" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
						xlink:href="F5.png"/>
				</fig>
				<!-- FIGURA 6 -->
				<fig id="fig-6-e002">
					<label>Figure 6</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) of Iranian populations of <italic>Medicago sinskiae</italic>.</title>
					</caption>
					<graphic id="gra-6-e002" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
						xlink:href="F6.png"/>
				</fig>
				<!-- FIGURA 7 -->
				<fig id="fig-7-e002">
					<label>Figure 7</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Neighbor-net network of individuals of <italic>Medicago sinskiae</italic> generated from the complement of Dice similarity coefficient.</title>
					</caption>
					<graphic id="gra-7-e002" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
						xlink:href="F7.png"/>
				</fig>
				<!-- FIGURA 8 -->
				<fig id="fig-8-e002">
					<label>Figure 8</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Dendrogram based on Nei’s Genetic Distance among the studied populations of <italic>Medicago sinskiae</italic>. </title>
					</caption>
					<graphic id="gra-8-e002" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
						xlink:href="F8.png"/>
				</fig>
				<!-- INICIO TABLA VI -->
				<table-wrap id="taw-6-e002" orientation="portrait" position="float">
					<label>Table 6</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) of <italic>Medicago sinskiae</italic>. DF: degrees of freedom; SS: sum of squares; MS: mean squares; Est. Var.: estimate of variance; PV: percentage of variation. Region 1, W Iran: populations ABD, KHW, KHR, SPC, SPD, and PLS; Region 2, SW Iran: populations FTH, BSN.</title>
					</caption>
					<table id="tab-6-e002" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
						<thead>
							<tr>
								<th>
									<bold>Source</bold>
								</th>
								<th>
									<bold>DF</bold>
								</th>
								<th>
									<bold>SS</bold>
								</th>
								<th>
									<bold>MS</bold>
								</th>
								<th>
									<bold>Est. Var.</bold>
								</th>
								<th>
									<bold>PV</bold>
								</th>
							</tr>
						</thead>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td>
							Among regions
						</td>
								<td>
							1
						</td>
								<td>
							6.294
						</td>
								<td>
							6.294
						</td>
								<td>
							0.002
						</td>
								<td>
							0%
						</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>
							Among populations
						</td>
								<td>
							6
						</td>
								<td>
							35.587
						</td>
								<td>
							5.931
						</td>
								<td>
							0.226
						</td>
								<td>
							5%
						</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>
							Within populations
						</td>
								<td>
							54
						</td>
								<td>
							229.297
						</td>
								<td>
							4.246
						</td>
								<td>
							4.246
						</td>
								<td>
							95%
						</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>
							Total
						</td>
								<td>
							61
						</td>
								<td>
							271.177
						</td>
								<td/>
								<td>
							4.474
						</td>
								<td>
							100%
						</td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
				</table-wrap>
			</sec>
		</sec>
		<sec id="sec-4-002">
			<title>DISCUSSION</title>
			<p>We showed that SSR markers have the potential to identify and separate the closely related species <italic>M. constricta</italic>, <italic>M. rigidula</italic> and <italic>M. sinskiae</italic>. SSR markers have been widely used to evaluate genetic diversity and polymorphism in plants. In our study of six loci in <italic>Medicago sinskiae</italic>, the mean of polymorphism in genotypes was remarkably high (77.08%) and was 100% in some populations. This indicates that <italic>M. sinskiae</italic> is a polymorphic species. Higher genetic diversity is usual in outcrossing species (<xref
					ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-43-e002">Szczecińska <italic>et al.</italic>, 2016</xref>). In a population genetic study of outcrossing <italic>Marrubium</italic> L., Salehi <italic>et al.</italic> (<xref
					ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-37-e002">2018</xref>) reported a high level of polymorphism (100% vs. our 77.08%), genetic diversity (<italic>G</italic>
				<sub>ST</sub> = 0.99 vs. our 0.4) and Shannon information index (<italic>I</italic> = 0.51 vs our 0.45). Our obtained values are quite high for species like annual <italic>Medicago</italic> that are are known to be inbreeders (<xref
					ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-40-e002">Small, 2011</xref>). A lower heterozygosity (<italic>H</italic>
				<sub>e</sub> = 0.348–0.479) was observed for self-pollinated annual species <italic>M. truncatula</italic> Gaertn. in the French Mediterranean region. Although in self-pollinated species pollen dispersal is very infrequent compared to outcrossing species, it is important because it generates novel genetic variability via recombinant lines (<xref
					ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-05-e002">Bonnin <italic>et al.</italic>, 2001</xref>). Riday <italic>et al.</italic> (<xref
					ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-36-e002">2015</xref>) reported a variable selfing rate (0 to 52.2%; mean 11.8%) in populations of perennial <italic>Medicago sativa</italic> L. Besides detecting a very high (99%) rate of selfing and a small seed dispersal distance in <italic>Medicago truncatula</italic>, Siol <italic>et al.</italic> (<xref
					ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-39-e002">2008</xref>) reported high genotypic diversity and polymorphism in some few inbred lines per population. The mean value of <italic>F</italic>
				<sub>IS</sub> in <italic>M. sinskiae</italic> is 0.923 (ranging from 0.582 to 1.000). Populations PLS and KHR showed higher levels of selfing rates (<italic>S</italic> = 1.000). Higher levels of gene flow (<italic>Nm</italic>) and population structure seems to have been more affected by dispersal patterns and not localized gene flow (<xref
					ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-04-e002">Bayat <italic>et al.</italic>, 2021</xref>; <xref
					ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-11-e002">Emami-Tabatabaei <italic>et al.</italic>, 2021</xref>; <xref
					ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-01-e002">Bagheri <italic>et al</italic>., 2022</xref>). Small increases in gene flow (<italic>Nm</italic>) will reduce population differentiation (<italic>F</italic>
				<sub>ST</sub>). Each individual in a selfing population differs from others. The accessions preserve their traits, and it will continue in the coming generation. It was shown in <italic>M. truncatula</italic>, when selfing rates are very large, the genetic and genotypic diversity can be high, while selfers are composed of a few inbred lines per population (<xref
					ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-03-e002">Bataillon &amp; Ronfort, 2006</xref>; <xref
					ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-39-e002">Siol <italic>et al.</italic>, 2008</xref>). Yan <italic>et al.</italic> (<xref
					ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-47-e002">2009</xref>) showed that self-pollination and dispersal mechanisms shaped the population genetic structure and geographical distribution of <italic>Medicago lupulina</italic> L. (<italic>F</italic>
				<sub>ST </sub>= 0.535) and <italic>Medicago ruthenica</italic> (L.) Trautv. (<italic>F</italic>
				<sub>ST </sub>= 0.130), and <italic>F</italic>
				<sub>ST</sub> in self-pollinated annual species is higher than outcrossing perennials. Selfing rates estimated from <italic>F</italic>
				<sub>IS</sub> values were more than 95% for <italic>M. lupulina</italic> but much lower (ca. 30%) for <italic>M. ruthenica</italic> (calculated from <xref
					ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-47-e002">Yan <italic>et al.</italic>, 2009</xref>). It is shown that selfing species of <italic>Zingiber</italic> Mill. have less genetic diversity at the population and species levels compared to outcrossing ones (<xref
					ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-20-e002">Huang <italic>et al</italic>., 2019</xref>).</p>
			<p>
				<italic>Medicago</italic>’s close relative genera <italic>Trigonella </italic>L., <italic>Melilotus</italic> Mill. and <italic>Trifolium</italic> L. have a passive floral pollination mechanism allowing flowers to be pollinated frequently. In contrast, the explosive tripping mechanism of pollination in the genus <italic>Medicago</italic> allows the flowers to be visited by pollinators only once (<xref
					ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-40-e002">Small, 2011</xref>). The genus <italic>Medicago</italic> includes both perennial and annual species. The perennial <italic>Medicago sativa</italic> is chiefly an outcrossing species with some populations benefitting from self-pollination. The floral structure of most of the annual species of <italic>Medicago</italic> is related to their mostly self-pollination nature. The annuals have flowers that may be closed (cleistogamous), although they are usually opened (chasmogamous) and auto tripping (<xref
					ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-32-e002">Novoselova, 2003</xref>). Outcrossing, at least partly, is present in nearly all perennial species of <italic>Medicago</italic>. In contrast, all the annual species of the genus <italic>Medicago</italic> seem to be strongly self-pollinated, with limited association with pollinators (<xref
					ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-40-e002">Small, 2011</xref>). Self-pollination, occurring in different ways, can have lasting impacts on genetic diversity. The morphological and phenological characteristics of flowers have impact on each mode of self-pollination (<xref
					ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-27-e002">Lloyd &amp; Schoen, 1992</xref>). In the absence of disturbance, migration events can partition populations into several independent recombinant lines, allowing a high level of genetic diversity to be sustained (<xref
					ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-05-e002">Bonnin <italic>et al.</italic>, 2001</xref>). The special genetic structure of <italic>M. sinskiae</italic> populations unrelated to geographical proximity is unlike many other annual self-pollinated medics (<xref
					ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-04-e002">Bayat <italic>et al.</italic>, 2021</xref>; <xref
					ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-11-e002">Emami-Tabatabaei <italic>et al.</italic>, 2021</xref>; <xref
					ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-01-e002">Bagheri <italic>et al</italic>., 2022</xref>) and should be explained differently. </p>
			<p>The presence of annual <italic>Medicago</italic> in Iran is well documented (<xref
					ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-18-e002">Heyn, 1963</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr"
					rid="ref-31-e002">Mehregan <italic>et al.</italic>, 2002</xref>). There is no record of <italic>M. sinskiae</italic> in Iran in the literature published before 2002 and searching for <italic>M. sinskiae</italic> in major Iranian herbaria were unsuccessful. First presence of <italic>M. sinskiae</italic> in Iran was spotted in 1999 by collecting some pods from western regions represented in this study by populations ABD, KHW, KHR, SPC, SPD and PLS. Localities BSN and FTH are among the regions searched for medics by the authors between 1994 and 1997, where no material matching the description of <italic>M. sinskiae</italic> was collected. This study is based on the new material collected from western and southwestern Iran in 2016–2017. Once limited to western Iran, <italic>M. sinskiae</italic> started to appear in southwestern Iran. The historical relationships of the Iranian and Turkmen populations are unclear. They could be the remainder of a species that was once widespread, or a relatively newly generated species that is now expanding its range; in any case, <italic>M. sinskiae</italic> is clearly expanding in Iran. Inbreeding species such as annual medics often have enhanced ability to rapidly expand because they do not require pollinators (<xref
					ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-02-e002">Barrett <italic>et al.</italic>, 2008</xref>; <xref
					ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-23-e002">Kalisz <italic>et al.</italic>, 2004</xref>). Lower genetic diversity with self-fertilization combined with human-mediated dispersal boosted rapid expansion of <italic>Brassica tournefortii</italic> Gouan in the United States (<xref
					ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-46-e002">Winkler <italic>et al.</italic>, 2019</xref>). When a species expands rapidly, distinct clusters based on geographical proximity cannot be distinguished. We suggest that similar structures observed in populations of <italic>M. sinskiae</italic> (<xref
					ref-type="fig" rid="fig-5-e002">Fig. 5</xref>) would not be the consequence of gene flow, migration, and connectivity of populations; rather, they were originated by the rapid expansion. This hypothesis agrees with AMOVA results (<xref
					ref-type="table" rid="taw-6-e002">Table 6</xref>), which show very low genetic diversity among populations (5%) and regions (0%). Annual medics such as <italic>M. sinskiae</italic> are excellent plants for feeding livestock (<xref
					ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-25-e002">Khassanov, 1972</xref>). They can disperse across relatively large distances via animal fur because of their spines and can dispersed with wind, rivers, and human activities. <italic>Medicago sinskiae</italic> is rapidly expanding in the western part of Zagrosian regions of Iran, a region dominated by oak forests (<xref
					ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-51-e002">Zohary, 1973</xref>). This area shows a rich diversity of wild and domestic animal life including sheep and goats. Life of many rural and nomad people of this area are dependent on grazing. The indehiscent spiny fruits of the annual medics are well adapted to dispersal in animal fur (<xref
					ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-40-e002">Small, 2011</xref>). This would explain why <italic>M. sinskiae</italic> in western Iran is expanding so fast. Given that climate change is now rapidly changing the distribution range of many species (<xref
					ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-24-e002">Kelly &amp; Goulden, 2008</xref>; <xref
					ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-16-e002">Gómez-Ruiz &amp; Lacher Jr., 2019</xref>), it will be interesting to follow the future distribution pattern of the species.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec id="sec-5-002">
			<title>CONCLUSIONS</title>
			<p>The genetic structure of <italic>M. sinskae</italic> is consistent with inbreeding, at least in Iranian populations, and it seems to be a species expanding its range. <italic>Medicago sinskiae</italic> may continue to expand into different regions of western and southwestern Iran, northern Iraq, and even southeastern Turkey, where its potential presence should be monitored. Furthermore, and despite further sampling is needed, results of our clustering and PCoA analyses suggest that <italic>M. sinskiae</italic> can be recognized as a separate species as it is differentiated from Iranian populations of <italic>M. rigidula</italic> and <italic>M. constricta</italic>.</p>
		</sec>
	</body>
	<back>
		<ack>
			<title>ACKNOWLEDGMENTS</title>
			<p>The authors would like to thank Dr. Sven Bikar, Dr. Bettina Ebner, and Dr. Tilmann Laufs for their helps in part of the bioinformatic analyses. We also would like to thank Dr. Javier López-Alvarado and two anonym reviewers for their valuable comments on an earlier draft of the manuscript.</p>
		</ack>
		<ref-list>
			<title>REFERENCES</title>
			<ref id="ref-01-e002">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Bagheri</surname>, <given-names>Z.</given-names>
						</string-name>, <string-name>
							<surname>Assadi</surname>, <given-names>M.</given-names>
						</string-name>, <string-name>
							<surname>Small</surname>, <given-names>E.</given-names>
						</string-name> &amp; <string-name>
							<surname>Mehregan</surname>, <given-names>I.</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2022</year>. <article-title>Cryptic molecular-geographical divergence within <italic>Medicago minima</italic> revealed by SSR markers.</article-title>
					<source>Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions A: Science</source>
					<issue>46</issue>: <fpage>49</fpage>–<lpage>60</lpage>. https://doi.org/<pub-id
						pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s40995-021-01236-8</pub-id>﻿</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="ref-02-e002">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Barrett</surname>, <given-names>S. C. H.</given-names>
						</string-name>, <string-name>
							<surname>Colautti</surname>, <given-names>R. I.</given-names>
						</string-name> &amp; <string-name>
							<surname>Eckert</surname>, <given-names>C. G</given-names>
						</string-name>.</person-group>
					<year>2008</year>. <article-title>Plant reproductive system and evolution during biological invasion</article-title>. <source>Molecular Ecology</source>
					<issue>17</issue>: <fpage>373</fpage>–<lpage>383</lpage>. https://doi.org/<pub-id
						pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-294x.2007.03503.x</pub-id>﻿</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="ref-03-e002">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Bataillon</surname>, <given-names>T.</given-names>
						</string-name> &amp; <string-name>
							<surname>Ronfort</surname>, <given-names>J</given-names>
						</string-name>.</person-group>
					<year>2006</year>. <article-title>Evolutionary and ecological genetics of <italic>Medicago truncatula</italic>
					</article-title>. In: <person-group person-group-type="editor">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Mathesius</surname>, <given-names>U</given-names>.</string-name>, <string-name>
							<surname>Journet</surname>, <given-names>E. P.</given-names>
						</string-name> &amp; <string-name>
							<surname>Sumner</surname>, <given-names>L. W. </given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>(Eds.), <source>The Medicago truncatula <italic>handbook</italic>. </source>
					<publisher-name>Noble Research Institute</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Ardmore</publisher-loc>: <fpage>1</fpage>–<lpage>13</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="ref-04-e002">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Bonnin</surname>, <given-names>I.</given-names>
						</string-name>, <string-name>
							<surname>Ronfort</surname>, <given-names>J.</given-names>
						</string-name>, <string-name>
							<surname>Wozniak</surname>, <given-names>F.</given-names>
						</string-name> &amp; <string-name>
							<surname>Olivieri</surname>, <given-names>I.</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2001</year>. <article-title>Spatial effects and rare outcrossing events in <italic>Medicago truncatula</italic> (Fabaceae)</article-title>. <source>Molecular Ecology</source>
					<issue>10</issue>: <fpage>1371</fpage>–<lpage>1383</lpage>. https://doi.org/<pub-id
						pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1365-294x.2001.01278.x</pub-id>﻿</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="ref-05-e002">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Bayat</surname>, <given-names>M.</given-names>
						</string-name>, <string-name>
							<surname>Assadi</surname>, <given-names>M.</given-names>
						</string-name>, <string-name>
							<surname>Small</surname>, <given-names>E.</given-names>
						</string-name> &amp; <string-name>
							<surname>Mehregan</surname>, <given-names>I.</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2021</year>. <article-title>Molecular studies of Iranian populations support the morphology-based taxonomic separation of Medicago rigidula and M. rigiduloides</article-title>. <source>Phytotaxa</source>
					<issue>518</issue>: <fpage>281</fpage>–<lpage>299</lpage>. https://doi.org/<pub-id
						pub-id-type="doi">10.11646/phytotaxa.518.4.5</pub-id>﻿</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="ref-06-e002">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Burkil</surname>, <given-names>A.</given-names>
						</string-name>, <string-name>
							<surname>Sieber,</surname>
							<given-names>N.</given-names>
						</string-name>, <string-name>
							<surname>Seppala</surname>, <given-names>K.</given-names>
						</string-name> &amp; <string-name>
							<surname>Jokela</surname>, <given-names>J.</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2017</year>. <article-title>Comparing direct and indirect selfing rate estimates: when are population-structure estimates reliable.</article-title>
					<source>Heredity</source>
					<issue>118</issue>: <fpage>525</fpage>–<lpage>533</lpage>. https://doi.org/<pub-id
						pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/hdy.2017.1</pub-id>﻿</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="ref-07-e002">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Chabane</surname>, <given-names>K.</given-names>
						</string-name>, <string-name>
							<surname>Varshney</surname>, <given-names>R. K.</given-names>
						</string-name>, <string-name>
							<surname>Graner</surname>, <given-names>A.</given-names>
						</string-name> &amp; <string-name>
							<surname>Valkoun</surname>, <given-names>J.</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2008</year>. <article-title>Generation and exploitation of EST-derived SSR markers for assaying molecular diversity in durum wheat populations</article-title>. <source>Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution</source>
					<issue>55</issue>: <fpage>869</fpage>–<lpage>881</lpage>. https://doi.org/<pub-id
						pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10722-007-9292-8</pub-id>﻿</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="ref-08-e002">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Dakin</surname>, <given-names>E.</given-names>
						</string-name> &amp; <string-name>
							<surname>Avise</surname>, <given-names>J.</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2004</year>. <article-title>Microsatellite null alleles in parentage analysis</article-title>. <source>Heredity</source>
					<issue>93</issue>: <fpage>504</fpage>–<lpage>509</lpage>. https://doi.org/<pub-id
						pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/sj.hdy.6800545</pub-id>﻿</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="ref-09-e002">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Doyle</surname>, <given-names>J. J.</given-names>
						</string-name> &amp; <string-name>
							<surname>Doyle</surname>, <given-names>J. L.</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1987</year>. <article-title>A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue</article-title>. <source>Phytochemical Bulletin</source>
					<issue>19</issue>: <fpage>11</fpage>–<lpage>15</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="ref-10-e002">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Earl</surname>, <given-names>D. A.</given-names>
						</string-name> &amp; <string-name>
							<surname>vonHoldt</surname>, <given-names>B. M.</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2012</year>. <article-title>Structure Harvester: a website and program for visualizing Structure output and implementing the Evanno method</article-title>. <source>Conservation Genetics Resources</source>
					<issue>4</issue>: <fpage>359</fpage>–<lpage>361</lpage>. https://doi.org/<pub-id
						pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12686-011-9548-7</pub-id>﻿</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="ref-11-e002">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Emami-Tabatabaei</surname>, <given-names>S. S.</given-names>
						</string-name>, <string-name>
							<surname>Small</surname>, <given-names>E.</given-names>
						</string-name>, <string-name>
							<surname>Assadi</surname>, <given-names>M.</given-names>
						</string-name>, <string-name>
							<surname>Dehshiri</surname>, <given-names>M. M.</given-names>
						</string-name> &amp; <string-name>
							<surname>Mehregan</surname>, <given-names>I.</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2021</year>. <article-title>Genetic variation among Iranian <italic>Medicago polymorpha </italic>L. populations based on SSR markers.</article-title>
					<source>Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution</source>
					<issue>68</issue>: <fpage>1411</fpage>–<lpage>1424</lpage>. https://doi.org/<pub-id
						pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10722-020-01071-7</pub-id>﻿</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="ref-12-e002">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Enayat Avval</surname>, <given-names>S.</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2017</year>. <article-title>Assessing polymorphism information content (PIC) using SSR markers on local species of <italic>Citrullus colocynthis</italic>. Case study: Iran, Sistan-Balouchestan Province.</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Molecular Biology Research</source>
					<issue>7</issue>: <fpage>42</fpage>–<lpage>49</lpage>. https://doi.org/<pub-id
						pub-id-type="doi">10.5539/jmbr.v7n1p42</pub-id>﻿</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="ref-13-e002">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Evanno</surname>, <given-names>G.</given-names>
						</string-name>, <string-name>
							<surname>Regnaut</surname>, <given-names>S.</given-names>
						</string-name> &amp; <string-name>
							<surname>Goudet</surname>, <given-names>J.</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2005</year>. <article-title>Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software structure: a simulation study.</article-title>
					<source>Molecular Ecology</source>
					<issue>14</issue>: <fpage>2611</fpage>–<lpage>2620</lpage>. https://doi.org/<pub-id
						pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02553.x</pub-id>﻿</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="ref-14-e002">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Faircloth</surname>, <given-names>B. C.</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2008</year>. <article-title>MSATCOMMANDER: Detection of microsatellite repeat arrays and automated, locus-specific primer design.</article-title>
					<source>Molecular Ecology Resources</source>
					<issue>8</issue>: <fpage>92</fpage>–<lpage>94</lpage>. https://doi.org/<pub-id
						pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01884.x</pub-id>﻿</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="ref-15-e002">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Freeland</surname>, <given-names>J. R.</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2020</year>. <source>Molecular ecology (3rd ed.)</source>. <publisher-name>Wiley-Blackwell</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>London</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="ref-16-e002">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Gómez-Ruiz</surname>, <given-names>E. P.</given-names>
						</string-name> &amp; <string-name>
							<surname>Lacher Jr.</surname>, <given-names>T. E.</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2019</year>. <article-title>Climate change, range shifts, and the disruption of a pollinator-plant complex.</article-title>
					<source>Scientific Reports</source>
					<issue>9</issue>: <fpage>14048</fpage>. https://doi.org/<pub-id
						pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-019-50059-6</pub-id>﻿</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="ref-17-e002">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Hammer</surname>, <given-names>Ø.</given-names>
						</string-name>, <string-name>
							<surname>Harper</surname>, <given-names>D. A. T.</given-names>
						</string-name> &amp; <string-name>
							<surname>Ryan</surname>, <given-names>P. D.</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2001</year>. <article-title>PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis</article-title>. <source>Palaeontologia Electronica</source>
					<issue>4</issue>: <volume>4</volume>. Retrieved <date-in-citation>May 20, 2021</date-in-citation>, from <comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://palaeo-electronica.org/2001_1/past/issue1_01.htm">http://palaeo-electronica.org/2001_1/past/issue1_01.htm</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="ref-18-e002">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Heyn</surname>, <given-names>C. C.</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1963</year>. <source>The annual species of Medicago</source>. <publisher-name>Magnes Press, The Hebrew University</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Jerusalem</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="ref-19-e002">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Heyn</surname>, <given-names>C. C.</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1984</year>. <chapter-title>Papilionaceae.</chapter-title> In: <person-group
						person-group-type="editor">Rechinger, K. H.</person-group> (Eds.), <source>Flora Iranica</source>. <publisher-name>Akademischer Druck-u. Verlagsanstalt</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Graz</publisher-loc>: <fpage>253</fpage>–<lpage>271</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="ref-20-e002">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Huang</surname>, <given-names>R.</given-names>
						</string-name>, <string-name>
							<surname>Chu</surname>, <given-names>Q. H.</given-names>
						</string-name>, <string-name>
							<surname>Lu</surname>, <given-names>G. H.</given-names>
						</string-name> &amp; <string-name>
							<surname>Wang</surname>, <given-names>Y. Q.</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2019</year>. <article-title>Comparative studies on population genetic structure of two closely related selfing and outcrossing Zingiber species in Hainan Island</article-title>. <source>Scientific Reports</source>
					<issue>9</issue>: <fpage>17997</fpage>. https://doi.org/<pub-id
						pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-019-54526-y</pub-id>﻿</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="ref-21-e002">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Huson</surname>, <given-names>D. H</given-names>.</string-name> &amp; <string-name>
							<surname>Bryant</surname>, <given-names>D.</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2006</year>. <article-title>Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies.</article-title>
					<source>Molecular Biology and Evolution</source>
					<issue>23</issue>: <fpage>254</fpage>–<lpage>267</lpage>. https://doi.org/<pub-id
						pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/molbev/msj030</pub-id>﻿</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="ref-22-e002">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Jakobsson</surname>, <given-names>M.</given-names>
						</string-name> &amp; <string-name>
							<surname>Rosenberg</surname>, <given-names>N. A.</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2007</year>. <article-title>CLUMPP: a cluster matching and permutation program for dealing with label switching and multimodality in analysis of population structure</article-title>. <source>Bioinformatics</source>
					<issue>23</issue>: <fpage>1801</fpage>–<lpage>1806</lpage>. https://doi.org/<pub-id
						pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/btm233</pub-id>﻿</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="ref-23-e002">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Kalisz</surname>, <given-names>S.</given-names>
						</string-name>, <string-name>
							<surname>Vogler</surname>, <given-names>D. W.</given-names>
						</string-name> &amp; <string-name>
							<surname>Hanley</surname>, <given-names>K. M.</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2004</year>. <article-title>Context-dependent autonomous self-fertilization yield reproductive assurance and mixed mating</article-title>. <source>Nature</source>
					<issue>430</issue>: <lpage>884</lpage>–<fpage>887</fpage>. https://doi.org/<pub-id
						pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature02776</pub-id>﻿</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="ref-24-e002">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Kelly</surname>, <given-names>A. E.</given-names>
						</string-name> &amp; <string-name>
							<surname>Goulden</surname>, <given-names>M. L.</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2008</year>. <article-title>Rapid shifts in plant distribution with recent climate change.</article-title>
					<source>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America</source>
					<issue>105</issue>: <fpage>1182</fpage>3–<lpage>11826</lpage>. https://doi.org/<pub-id
						pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.0802891105</pub-id>﻿</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="ref-25-e002">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Khassanov</surname>, <given-names>O. Kh.</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1972</year>. <source>Wild alfalfas of central Asia</source>. <publisher-name>Academy of Sciences of the Uzbek SSR</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Tashkent</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="ref-26-e002">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Koressaar</surname>, <given-names>T.</given-names>
						</string-name>, <string-name>
							<surname>Lepamets</surname>, <given-names>M.</given-names>
						</string-name>, <string-name>
							<surname>Kaplinski,</surname>
							<given-names>L.</given-names>
						</string-name>, <string-name>
							<surname>Raime</surname>, <given-names>K.</given-names>
						</string-name>, <string-name>
							<surname>Andreson</surname>, <given-names>R.</given-names>
						</string-name> &amp; <string-name>
							<surname>Remm</surname>, <given-names>M.</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2018</year>. P<article-title>rimer3_masker: integrating masking of template sequence with primer design software</article-title>. <source>Bioinformatics</source>
					<issue>34</issue>: <fpage>1937</fpage>–<lpage>1938</lpage>. https://doi.org/<pub-id
						pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/bty036</pub-id>﻿</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="ref-27-e002">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Lloyd</surname>, <given-names>D. G.</given-names>
						</string-name> &amp; <string-name>
							<surname>Schoen</surname>, <given-names>D. J.</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1992</year>. <article-title>Self-fertilization and cross-fertilization in plants. I. Functional dimensions.</article-title>
					<source>International Journal of Plant Sciences</source>
					<issue>153</issue>: <lpage>358</lpage>–<fpage>369</fpage>. https://doi.org/<pub-id
						pub-id-type="doi">10.1086/297040</pub-id>﻿</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="ref-28-e002">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Luo</surname>, <given-names>Z.</given-names>
						</string-name>, <string-name>
							<surname>Brock</surname>, <given-names>J.</given-names>
						</string-name>, <string-name>
							<surname>Dyer</surname>, <given-names>J. M.</given-names>
						</string-name>, <string-name>
							<surname>Kutchan</surname>, <given-names>T.</given-names>
						</string-name>, <string-name>
							<surname>Schachtman</surname>, <given-names>D.</given-names>
						</string-name>, <string-name>
							<surname>Augustin</surname>, <given-names>M.</given-names>
						</string-name>, <string-name>
							<surname>Ge</surname>, 
						<given-names>Y.</given-names>
						</string-name>, <string-name>
							<surname>Fahlgren</surname>, <given-names>N.</given-names>
						</string-name> &amp; <string-name>
							<surname>Abdel-Haleem</surname>, <given-names>H.</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2019</year>. <article-title>Genetic diversity and population structure of a <italic>Camelina sativa</italic> spring panel</article-title>. <source>Frontiers in Plant Science</source>
					<issue>10</issue>: <fpage>184</fpage>. https://doi.org/<pub-id
						pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2019.00184</pub-id>﻿</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="ref-29-e002">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Magoč</surname>, <given-names>T.</given-names>
						</string-name> &amp; </person-group>
					<string-name>
						<surname>Salzberg</surname>, <given-names>S. L.</given-names>
					</string-name>
					<year>2011</year>. <article-title>FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies</article-title>. <source>Bioinformatics</source>
					<issue>27</issue>: <fpage>2957</fpage>–<lpage>2963</lpage>. https://doi.org/<pub-id
						pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/btr507</pub-id>﻿</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="ref-30-e002">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Mantel</surname>, <given-names>N.</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1967</year>. <article-title>The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach.</article-title>
					<source>Cancer Research</source>
					<issue>27</issue>: <fpage>209</fpage>–<lpage>220</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="ref-31-e002">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Mehregan</surname>, <given-names>I.</given-names>
						</string-name>, <string-name>
							<surname>Rahiminejad</surname>, <given-names>M. R.</given-names>
						</string-name> &amp; <string-name>
							<surname>Azizian</surname>, <given-names>D.</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2002</year>. <article-title>A taxonomic revision of the genus <italic>Medicago</italic> L. (Fabaceae) in Iran</article-title>. <source>Iranian Journal of Botany</source>
					<issue>9</issue>: <fpage>207</fpage>–<lpage>221</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="ref-32-e002">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Novoselova</surname>, <given-names>L. V.</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2003</year>. <article-title>Bud cleistogamy at annual species of genus <italic>Medicago</italic>
					</article-title>. <source>Czech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding</source>
					<issue>39</issue>: <fpage>285</fpage>–<lpage>287</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="ref-33-e002">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Pagnotta</surname>, <given-names>M. A.</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2018</year>. <article-title>Comparison among methods and statistical software package to analyze germplasm genetic diversity by means of codominant markers</article-title>. <source>J</source>
					<issue>1</issue>: <fpage>197</fpage>–<lpage>215</lpage>. https://doi.org/<pub-id
						pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/j1010018</pub-id>﻿</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="ref-34-e002">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Peakall</surname>, <given-names>R.</given-names>
						</string-name> &amp; <string-name>
							<surname>Smouse</surname>, <given-names>P. E</given-names>.</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2012</year>. <article-title>GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research an-update</article-title>. <source>Bioinformatics</source>
					<issue>28</issue>: <fpage>2537</fpage>–<lpage>2539</lpage>. https://doi.org/<pub-id
						pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/bts460</pub-id>﻿</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="ref-35-e002">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Pritchard</surname>, <given-names>J. K.</given-names>
						</string-name>, <string-name>
							<surname>Stephens</surname>, <given-names>M.</given-names>
						</string-name> &amp; <string-name>
							<surname>Donnelly</surname>, <given-names>P.</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2000</year>. <article-title>Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data</article-title>. <source>Genetics</source>
					<issue>155</issue>: <fpage>945</fpage>–<lpage>959</lpage>. https://doi.org/<pub-id
						pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/genetics/155.2.945</pub-id>﻿</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="ref-36-e002">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Riday</surname>, <given-names>H.</given-names>
						</string-name>, <string-name>
							<surname>Reisen</surname>, <given-names>P.</given-names>
						</string-name>, <string-name>
							<surname>Raasch</surname>, <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
						</string-name>, <string-name>
							<surname>Santa-Martinez</surname>, <given-names>E.</given-names>
						</string-name> &amp; <string-name>
							<surname>Brunet</surname>, <given-names>J.</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2015</year>. <article-title>Selfing rate in Alfalfa seed production field pollinated with leafcutter bees</article-title>. <source>Crop Science</source>
					<issue>55</issue>: <fpage>1087</fpage>–<lpage>1095</lpage>. https://doi.org/<pub-id
						pub-id-type="doi">10.2135/cropsci2014.04.0295</pub-id>﻿</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="ref-37-e002">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Salehi</surname>, <given-names>N</given-names>.</string-name>, <string-name>
							<surname>Kharazian</surname>, <given-names>N.</given-names>
						</string-name> &amp; <string-name>
							<surname>Shiran</surname>, <given-names>B.</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2018</year>. <article-title>Genetic diversity of Marrubium species from Zagros region (Iran), using inter simple sequence repeat molecular marker</article-title>. <source>Journal of Sciences, Islamic Republic of Iran</source>
					<issue>29</issue>: <fpage>7</fpage>–<lpage>19</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="ref-38-e002">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Shendure</surname>, <given-names>J.</given-names>
						</string-name> &amp; <string-name>
							<surname>Ji</surname>, <given-names>H.</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2008</year>. <article-title>Next-generation DNA sequencing.</article-title>
					<source>Nature Biotechnology</source>
					<issue>26</issue>: <fpage>1135</fpage>–<lpage>1145</lpage>. https://doi.org/<pub-id
						pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nbt1486</pub-id>﻿</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="ref-39-e002">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Siol</surname>, <given-names>M.</given-names>
						</string-name>, <string-name>
							<surname>Prosperi</surname>, <given-names>J. M.</given-names>
						</string-name>, <string-name>
							<surname>Bonnin</surname>, <given-names>I.</given-names>
						</string-name> &amp; <string-name>
							<surname>Ronfort</surname>, <given-names>J.</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2008</year>. <article-title>How multilocus genotypic pattern helps to understand the history of selfing populations: a case study in Medicago truncatula</article-title>. <source>Heredity</source>
					<issue>100</issue>: <fpage>517</fpage>–<lpage>525</lpage>. https://doi.org/<pub-id
						pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/hdy.2008.5</pub-id>﻿</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="ref-40-e002">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Small</surname>, <given-names>E.</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2011</year>. <source>Alfalfa and relatives. Evolution and classification of <italic>Medicago</italic>.</source>
					<publisher-name>NRC Research Press</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Ottawa</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="ref-41-e002">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Small</surname>, <given-names>E.</given-names>
						</string-name> &amp; <string-name>
							<surname>Brookes</surname>, <given-names>B.</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1991</year>. <article-title>A clarification of Medicago sinskiae Uljan</article-title>. <source>Canadian Journal of Botany</source>
					<issue>69</issue>: <fpage>100</fpage>–<lpage>106</lpage>. https://doi.org/<pub-id
						pub-id-type="doi">10.1139/b91-014</pub-id>﻿</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="ref-42-e002">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Small</surname>, <given-names>E.</given-names>
						</string-name> &amp; <string-name>
							<surname>Jomphe</surname>, <given-names>M.</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1989</year>. <article-title>A synopsis of the genus <italic>Medicago</italic> (Leguminosae)</article-title>. <source>Canadian Journal of Botany</source>
					<issue>67</issue>: <fpage>3260</fpage>–<lpage>3294</lpage>. https://doi.org/<pub-id
						pub-id-type="doi">10.1139/b89-405</pub-id>﻿</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="ref-43-e002">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Szczecińska</surname>, <given-names>M.</given-names>
						</string-name>, <string-name>
							<surname>Sramko</surname>, <given-names>G.</given-names>
						</string-name>, <string-name>
							<surname>Wołosz</surname>, <given-names>K.</given-names>
						</string-name> &amp; <string-name>
							<surname>Sawicki</surname>, <given-names>J.</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2016</year>. <article-title>Genetic diversity and population structure of rare and endangered plant species Pulsatilla patens (L.) Mill. in East Central Europe</article-title>. <source>PLoS ONE</source>
					<issue>11</issue>: <fpage>1</fpage>–<lpage>24</lpage>. https://doi.org/<pub-id
						pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0151730</pub-id>﻿</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="ref-44-e002">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Takezaki</surname>, <given-names>N.</given-names>
						</string-name>, <string-name>
							<surname>Nei</surname>, <given-names>M.</given-names>
						</string-name> &amp; <string-name>Tamura, K.</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2009</year>. <article-title>POPTREE2: Software for constructing population trees from allele frequency data and computing other population statistics with Windows interface.</article-title>
					<source>Molecular Biology and Evolution</source>
					<issue>27</issue>: <fpage>747</fpage>–<lpage>752</lpage>. https://doi.org/<pub-id
						pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/molbev/msp312</pub-id>﻿</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="ref-45-e002">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Uljanova</surname>, <given-names>T.</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1964</year>. <chapter-title>A new species of medic from Turkmenia</chapter-title>. <source>Novosti Sistematiki Vysshikh Rastenii</source>
					<publisher-loc>Moscow, Leningrad</publisher-loc>
					<issue>175</issue>: <fpage>175</fpage>–<lpage>177</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="ref-46-e002">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Winkler</surname>, <given-names>D. E.</given-names>
						</string-name>, <string-name>
							<surname>Chapin,</surname>
							<given-names>K. J.</given-names>
						</string-name>, <string-name>
							<surname>François</surname>, <given-names>O.</given-names>
						</string-name>, <string-name>
							<surname>Garmon</surname>, <given-names>J. D.</given-names>
						</string-name>, <string-name>
							<surname>Gaut</surname>, <given-names>B. S.</given-names>
						</string-name> &amp; <string-name>
							<surname>Huxman</surname>, <given-names>T. E.</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2019</year>. <article-title>Multiple introductions and population structure during the rapid expansion of invasive Sahara mustard (<italic>Brassica tournefortii</italic>)</article-title>. <source>Ecology and Evolution</source>
					<issue>9</issue>: <fpage>7928</fpage>–<lpage>7941</lpage>. https://doi.org/<pub-id
						pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ece3.5239</pub-id>﻿</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="ref-47-e002">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Yan</surname>, <given-names>J.</given-names>
						</string-name>, <string-name>
							<surname>Chu</surname>, <given-names>H.-J.</given-names>
						</string-name>, <string-name>
							<surname>Wang</surname>, <given-names>H.-C.</given-names>
						</string-name>, <string-name>
							<surname>Li</surname>, <given-names>J.-Q.</given-names>
						</string-name> &amp; <string-name>
							<surname>Sang</surname>, <given-names>T.</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2009</year>. <article-title>Population genetic structure of two <italic>Medicago</italic> species shaped by distinct life form, mating system and seed dispersal</article-title>. <source>Annals of Botany</source>
					<issue>103</issue>: <fpage>825</fpage>–<lpage>834</lpage>. https://doi.org/<pub-id
						pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/aob/mcp006</pub-id>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="ref-48-e002">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Yang</surname>, <given-names>T.</given-names>
						</string-name>, <string-name>
							<surname>Fang</surname>, <given-names>L.</given-names>
						</string-name>, <string-name>
							<surname>Zhang</surname>, <given-names>X.</given-names>
						</string-name>, <string-name>
							<surname>Hu</surname>, <given-names>J.</given-names>
						</string-name>, <string-name>
							<surname>Bao</surname>, <given-names>S.</given-names>
						</string-name>, <string-name>
							<surname>Hao</surname>, <given-names>J.</given-names>
						</string-name>, <string-name>
							<surname>Li</surname>, <given-names>L.</given-names>
						</string-name>, <string-name>
							<surname>He</surname>, <given-names>Y.</given-names>
						</string-name>, <string-name>
							<surname>Jiang</surname>, <given-names>J.</given-names>
						</string-name>, <string-name>
							<surname>Wang</surname>, <given-names>F.</given-names>
						</string-name>, <string-name>
							<surname>Tian</surname>, <given-names>S.</given-names>
						</string-name> &amp; <string-name>
							<surname>Zong</surname>, <given-names>X.</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2015</year>. <article-title>High-throughput development of SSR markers from Pea (<italic>Pisum sativum</italic> L.) based on next generation sequencing of a purified Chinese commercial variety</article-title>. <source>PLoS ONE </source>
					<issue>10</issue>: e0139775. https://doi.org/<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0139775</pub-id>﻿</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="ref-49-e002">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Yeh</surname>, <given-names>F. C.</given-names>
						</string-name>, <string-name>
							<surname>Yang</surname>, <given-names>R. C.</given-names>
						</string-name>, <string-name>
							<surname>Boyle</surname>, <given-names>T. B. J.</given-names>
						</string-name>, <string-name>
							<surname>Ye</surname>, <given-names>Z. H.</given-names>
						</string-name> &amp; <string-name>
							<surname>Mao</surname>, <given-names>J. X.</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1999</year>. <article-title>POPGENE, version 1.32: the user friendly shareware for population genetic analysis</article-title>. <source>Biotechnology and Molecular Biology</source>
					<issue>10</issue>: <fpage>295</fpage>–<lpage>301</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="ref-50-e002">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Zareei,</surname>
							<given-names>R.</given-names>
						</string-name>, <string-name>
							<surname>Small</surname>, <given-names>E.</given-names>
						</string-name>, <string-name>
							<surname>Assadi,</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</string-name> &amp; <string-name>
							<surname>Mehregan</surname>, <given-names>I.</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2020</year>. <article-title>The taxonomic status of <italic>Medicago sinskiae</italic>: insights from morphological and molecular data</article-title>. <source>Journal of Taxonomy and Biosystematics</source>
					<issue>12</issue>: <fpage>1</fpage>–<lpage>14</lpage>. https://dx.doi.org/<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22108/tbj.2020.125443.1132</pub-id>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="ref-51-e002">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Zohary</surname>, <given-names>M.</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1973</year>. <source>Geobotanical foundations of the Middle East</source>. <publisher-name>Gustav Fischer Verlag</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Stuttgart</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
		</ref-list>
	</back>
</article>
