Genetic structure and seed germination in Portuguese populations of Cheirolophus uliginosus (Asteraceae): Implications for conservation strategies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/collectbot.2013.v32.003Keywords:
germination rate, habitat loss, haplotype structure, seed predation, small populationsAbstract
Cheirolophus uliginosus is a threatened species, endemic to the Atlantic coast of the Iberian Peninsula, where it occupies a few restricted localities. In our study we analysed the patterns of cpDNA haplotypes variation and reproductive success—germinability—among seven Portuguese populations of varying size. The aim was to examine the reproductive performance of Ch. uliginosus related to genetic structure and population size. The results showed very low within-population variability of cpDNA markers. Our study indicates that the germination rate is significantly reduced in small populations (< 50 plants) whereas medium (50–250 individuals) and large-sized (> 250 individuals) do not show any constraint. In the search for plausible causes explaining the lower germination success in the smallest populations, ecological concerns and genetic isolation must be taken into account. Besides, in large-sized populations of Ch. uliginosus (> 250 plants) a higher incidence of predispersal seed predation was observed, maybe affecting their sexual reproductive response. Finally, smaller populations—presenting a reduced reproductive success—contain also the most evolutionary distant haplotypes, so their conservation should be a priority.
Downloads
References
Allee, W. C. 1931. Animal aggregations: a study in general sociology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. http://dx.doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.7313
Arvanitis, L., Wiklund, C. & Ehrlén, J. 2007. Butterfly seed predation: effects of landscape characteristics, plant ploidy level and population structure. Oecologia 152: 275–285. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-007-0659-5
Ba-ares, A., Blanca, G., Gu.emes, J., Moreno, J. C. & Ortiz, S. (Eds.) 2009. Atlas y Libro Rojo de la flora vascular amenazada de Espa-a. Adenda 2008. Dirección General de Medio Natural y Política Forestal & Sociedad Espa-ola de Biología de la Conservación de Plantas, Madrid.
Baskin, J. M. & Baskin, C. C. 1973. Plant population differences in dormancy and germination characteristics of seeds: Heredity or environment? American Midland Naturalist 90: 493–498. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2424478
Bataillon, T. & Kirkpatrick, M. 2000. Inbreeding depression due to mildly deleterious mutations in finite populations: size does matter. Genetic Research 75: 75–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0016672399004048
Berec, L., Angulo, E. & Courchamp, F. 2007. Multiple Allee effects and population management. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 22: 185–191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2006.12.002
Brooks, T. M., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G. et al. 2002. Habitat loss and extinction in the hotspots of biodiversity. Conservation Biology 16: 909–923. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00530.x
Casermeiro, M. A., García, C., Giraldo, J. et al. 2002. Estado de los humedales espa-oles. Puesta en práctica de las recomendaciones Ramsar sobre su conservación y uso racional: reflexiones de gestores y propuestas de WWF/ Adena. WWF/Adena, Madrid.
Clement, M., Posada, D. & Crandall, K. 2000. TC S: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Molecular Ecology 9: 1657–1660. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.01020.x
Colas, B., Olivieri, I. & Riba, M. 2001. Spatio-temporal variation of reproductive success and conservation of the narrow-endemic Centaurea corymbosa (Asteraceae). Biological Conservation 99: 375–386. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00229-9
Costin, J. C., Morgan, J. W. & Young, G. A. 2001. Reproductive success does not decline in fragmented populations of Leucochrysum albicans subsp. albicans var. tricolor (Asteraceae). Biological Conservation 98: 273–284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00165-8
Cullings, K. W. 1992. Design and testing of a plant-specific PCR primer for ecological and evolutionary studies. Molecular Ecology 1: 233–240. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.1992.tb00182.x
Cunningham, S. A. 2000. Effects of habitat fragmentation on the reproductive ecology of four plant species in Mallee Woodland. Conservation Biology 14: 758–768. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.98609.x
Doyle, J. J. & Doyle, J. L. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin 19: 11–15.
El Mousadik, A. & Petit, R. J. 1996. Chloroplast DNA phylogeography of the argan tree of Morocco. Molecular Ecology 5: 547–555. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.1996.tb00346.x
Fernández, M., Lobo, J., Chacón, E. & Quesada, M. 2008. Curculionid beetles in aborted flower buds and immature fruits of Ceiba pentandra (Bombacaceae). Plant Ecology 194: 1–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11258-007-9272-2
Fischer, M. & Matthies, D. 1998. Effects of population size on performance in the rare plant Gentianella germanica. Journal of Ecology 86: 195–204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2745.1998.00246.x
Frankel, O. H. & Soulé, M. E. 1981. Conservation and evolu tion. Cambridge University Press, New York.
Garnatje, T. 1995. Relació entre el polimorfisme enzimàtic i alguns aspectes de l'especiació i de l'evolució en el gènere Cheirolophus Cass. PhD Thesis, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Bellaterra.
Gilpin, M. E. & Soulé, M. E. 1986. Minimum viable populations: processes of species extinction. In: Soulé, M. E. (Ed.), Conservation biology: The science of scarcity and diversity. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland: 19–34.
Groom, M. J. 1998. Allee effects limit population viability of an annual plant. American Naturalist 151: 487–496. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/286135
Hall, T. A. 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/ NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41: 95–98.
Hauser, T. P. & Loeschcke, V. 1994. Inbreeding depression and mating-distance dependent offspring fitness in large and small populations of Lychnis flos-cuculi (Caryophyllaceae). Journal of Evolutionary Biology 7: 609–622. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1420-9101.1994.7050609.x
Hensen, I. & Oberprieler, C. 2005. Effects of population size on genetic diversity and seed production in the rare Dictamnus albus (Rutaceae) in central Germany. Conservation Genetics 6: 63–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10592-004-7745-6
Higgins, K. & Lynch, M. 2001. Metapopulation extinction caused by mutation accumulation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 98: 2928–2933. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.031358898
Höglund, J. 2009. Evolutionary conservation genetics. Oxford University Press, New York. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199214211.001.0001
ICNF (Instituto da Conservação da Natureza e das Florestas) 2013. Naturaleza e áreas classificadas. Instituto da Conservação da Natureza e das Florestas, Lisboa. Retrieved January 24, 2013, from http://www.icnf.pt/portal/naturaclas
IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature) 2011. Guidelines for using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria. Version 9.0. Standards and Petitions Subcommittee of the IUCN Species Survival Commission (IUCN), Gland & Cambridge. Retrieved February 22, 2012, from http://www.iucnredlist.org/documents/RedListGuidelines.pdf
Janzen, D. H. 1971. Seed predation by animals. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 2: 465–492. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.02.110171.002341
Kéry, M., Matthies, D. & Spillmann, H.-H. 2000. Reduced fecundity and offspring performance in small populations of the declining grassland plants Primula veris and Gentiana lutea. Journal of Ecology 88: 17–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2745.2000.00422.x
Kolb, A., Ehrlén, J. & Eriksson, O. 2007. Ecological and evolutionary consequences of spatial and temporal variation in pre-dispersal seed predation. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 9: 79–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ppees.2007.09.001
Lammi, A., Siikamäki, P. & Mustajärvi, K. 1999. Genetic diversity, population size and fitness in central and peripheral populations of a rare plant Lychnis viscaria. Conservation Biology 13: 1069–1078. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.98278.x
Lamont, B. B., Klinkhame, P. G. L. & Witkowski, E. T. F. 1993. Population fragmentation may reduce fertility to zero in Banksia goodii: a demonstration of the Allee effect. Oecologia 94: 446–450. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00317122
Le Cadre, S., Tully, T., Mazer, S. J., Ferdy, J.-B., Moret, J. & Machon, N. 2008. Allee effects within small populations of Aconitum napellus ssp. lusitanicum, a protected subspecies in northern France. New Phytologist 179: 1171–1182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02529.x
Louda, S. M. 1983. Seed predation and seedling mortality in the recruitment of a shrub, Haplopappus venetus (Asteraceae), along a climatic gradient. Ecology 64: 511–521. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1939971
Luijten, S. H., Oostermeijer, G. B., van Leeuwen, N. C. & den Nijs, H. C. M. 1996. Reproductive success and clonal genetic structure of the rare Arnica montana (Compositae) in The Netherlands. Plant Systematics and Evolution 201: 15–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00989049
Menges, E. S. 1991. Seed germination percentage increases with population size in a fragmented prairie species. Conservation Biology 5: 158–164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.1991.tb00120.x
Metcalf, C. J. E., Rees, M., Buckley, Y. M. & Sheppard, A. W. 2009. Seed predators and the evolutionary stables flowering strategy in the invasive plant, Carduus nutans. Evolutionary Ecology 23: 893–906. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10682-008-9279-8
Morgan, J. W. 1999. Effects of population size on seed production and germinability in an endangered, fragmented grassland plant. Conservation Biology 13: 266–273. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.013002266.x
Oostermeijer, J. G. B., van Eijck, M. W., van Leeuwen, N. C. & den Nijs, J. C. M. 1995. Analysis of the relationship between allozyme heterozygosity and fitness in the rare Gentiana pneumonanthe L. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 8: 739–759. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1420-9101.1995.8060739.x
Östergård, H. & Ehrlén, J. 2005. Among population variation in specialist and generalist seed predation – the importance of host plant distribution, alternative hosts and environmental variation. Oikos 111: 39–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13902.x
Ouborg, N. J. & van Treuren, R. 1995. Variation in fitnessrelated characters among small and large populations of Salvia pratensis. Journal of Ecology 83: 369–380. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2261591
Palacios-González, M. J., Vázquez-Pardo, F. M., Sánchez-García, A., Mu-oz-Barco, P. & Gutiérrez-Esteban, M. 2008. Catálogo regional de especies vegetales amenazadas de Extremadura. Junta de Extremadura, Badajoz.
Paschke, M. C. A. & Schmid, B. 2002. Relationship between population size, allozyme variation, and plant performance in the narrow endemic Cochlearia bavarica. Conservation Genetics 3: 131–144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1015293530776
Pavlik, B. M. 1994. Demographic monitoring and the recovery of endangered plants. In: Bowles, M. L. & Whelan, C. J. (Eds.), Restoration of endangered species: Conceptual issues, planning and implementation. Cambridge University Press, New York: 322–350. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511623325.017
R Development Core Team 2008. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
Rabasa, S. G., Gutiérrez, D. & Escudero, A. 2009. Temporal variation in the effects of habitat fragmentation on reproduction of the Mediterranean shrub Colutea hispanica. Plant Ecology 200: 241–254. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11258-008-9448-4
Reed, D. H. 2005. Relationship between population size and fitness. Conservation Biology 19: 563–568. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00444.x
Rivas-Martínez, S., Costa, M., Castroviejo, S. & Valdés, E. 1980. Vegetación de Do-ana (Huelva, Espa-a). Lazaroa 2: 3–189.
Saeki, I. & Murakami, N. 2009. Chloroplast DNA phylogeography of the endangered Japanese red maple (Acer pycnanthum): the spatial configuration of wetlands shapes genetic diversity. Diversity and Distributions 15: 917–927. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2009.00609.x
Schlötterer, C. 2004. The evolution of molecular markers – just a matter of fashion? Nature Reviews Genetics 5: 63–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrg1249
Shaw, J., Lickey, E. B., Beck, J. T., et al. 2005. The tortoise and the hare II: relative utility of 21 noncoding chloroplast DNA sequences for phylogenetic analysis. American Journal of Botany 92: 142-166. http://dx.doi.org/10.3732/ajb.92.1.142
Shaw, J., Lickey, E. B., Schilling, E. E. & Small, R. L. 2007. Comparison of whole chloroplast genome sequences to choose noncoding regions for phylogenetic studies in angiosperms: the tortoise and the hare III. American Journal of Botany 94: 275–288. http://dx.doi.org/10.3732/ajb.94.3.275
Soltis, D. E., Soltis, P. S., Collier, T. G. & Edgerton, M. L. 1991. The Heuchera group (Saxifragaceae): evidence for chloroplast transfer and paraphyly. American Journal of Botany 78: 1091–1112. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2444898
Soltis, D. E., Soltis, P. S. & Milligan, B. G. 1992. Intraspecific chloroplast DNA variation: Systematic and phylogenetic implications. In: Soltis, P. S., Soltis, D. E. & Doyle, J. J. (Eds.), Molecular systematics of plants. Chapman and Hall, London: 117–150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-3276-7_6
Stephens, P. A. & Sutherland, W. J. 1999. Consequences of the Allee effect for behaviour, ecology and conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14: 401–405. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01684-5
Susanna, A. 1993. Mapa 511. Cheirolophus uliginosus (Brot.) Dostál. In: Fernández-Casas, J. & Morales, M. J. (Eds.), Asientos para un atlas corológico de la flora occidental, 20. Fontqueria 36: 208–210.
Ueno, S., Setsuko, S., Kawahara, T. & Yoshimaru, H. 2005. Genetic diversity and differentiation of the endangered Japanese endemic tree Magnolia stellata using nuclear and chloroplast microsatellite markers. Conservation Genetics 6: 563–574. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10592-005-9011-y
Vergeer, P., Rengelink, R., Copal, A. & Ouborg, N. J. 2003. The interacting effects of genetic variation, habitat quality and population size on performance of Succisa pratensis. Journal of Ecology 91: 18–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2745.2003.00736.x
Zhao, Y. J. & Gong, X. 2011. Genetic structure of the endangered Leucomeris decora (Asteraceae) in China inferred from chloroplast and nuclear DNA markers. Conservation Genetics 13: 271–281. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10592-011-0281-2
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2013 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the print and online versions of this journal are the property of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the licence. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 licence must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the final version of the work produced by the publisher, is not allowed.
